Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26448480›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Social Mobility and Mental Disorders at 30 Years of Age in Participants of the 1982 Cohort, Pelotas, Rio Grande Do Sul - RS.

Lenice de Castro Muniz de Quadros, Luciana de Avila Quevedo, Janaína Vieira dos Santos Motta, André Carraro, Felipe Garcia Ribeiro, Bernardo Lessa Horta, Denise Petrucci Gigante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lenice de Castro Muniz de QuadrosGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas (Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Luciana de Avila QuevedoGraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas (Universidade Católica de Pelotas - UCPel), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Janaína Vieira dos Santos MottaGraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas (Universidade Católica de Pelotas - UCPel), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
André CarraroGraduate Program in Organizations and Markets, Federal University of Pelotas (Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Felipe Garcia RibeiroGraduate Program in Organizations and Markets, Federal University of Pelotas (Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Bernardo Lessa HortaGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas (Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Denise Petrucci GiganteGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas (Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between mental disorders at 30 years of age and social mobility by formally testing three hypotheses: Risk Accumulation; Critical Period; and Social Mobility. The study was performed using data from the 30-year follow-up of the Pelotas Birth Cohort Study, conducted in 1982, and data from previous follow-ups. The tool used to evaluate mental health was the Self Report Questionnaire (SRQ-20). For the statistical analysis, the chi-square test with the Yates correction was used to estimate the prevalence of mental disorder, and the Poisson regression with robust variance was used to formally test the hypotheses according to the Risk Accumulation, Critical Period and Social Mobility Models. The analyses were stratified by gender. The prevalence of Common Mental Disorders (CMDs) was 24.3% (95% CI 22.9-25.7) when the whole sample was considered. The highest prevalence, 27.1% (95% CI 25.1-29.2), was found in women, and the difference between genders was significant (p < 0.001). CMDs were more frequent in participants who remained "poor" in the three follow-ups. In both men and women, the best fit was obtained with the Risk Accumulation Model, with p = 0.6348 and p = 0.2105, respectively. The results indicate the need to rethink public income maintenance policies. Finally, we suggest further studies to investigate the role of different public policies in decreasing the prevalence of mental disorders and thus contribute proposals of new policies that may contribute to the prevention of these disorders.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersPrevalenceSocial Mobility

Identifiers

PMID26448480
PMCPMC4598184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.