Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26448183›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Inducing Expectations for Health: Effects of Verbal Suggestion and Imagery on Pain, Itch, and Fatigue as Indicators of Physical Sensitivity.

Kaya J Peerdeman, Antoinette I M van Laarhoven, A Rogier T Donders, Maria T E Hopman, Madelon L Peters, Andrea W M Evers

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Placebo-like analgesia via response imagery.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2017
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What is new in the psychology of chronic itch?Experimental dermatology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Placebo and nocebo effects on itch : Methodological and clinical implications].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kaya J PeerdemanUnit Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Antoinette I M van LaarhovenUnit Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
A Rogier T DondersDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Maria T E HopmanDepartment of Physiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Madelon L PetersDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Andrea W M EversUnit Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledResearch into placebo effects has convincingly shown that inducing positive outcome expectations can reduce pain and other physical sensations. However, the comparative effects of different expectation inductions, such as verbal suggestion or mental imagery, and their generic effects on physical sensitivity, to different sensations such as pain, itch, and fatigue, are still largely unknown. In the current study, we assessed the individual and combined effects of verbal suggestion and imagery on pain, itch, and fatigue as indicators of physical sensitivity in a randomized study design. Healthy participants (n = 116) were given an inert (placebo) capsule that was said to be effective for reducing physical sensitivity in either the majority (positive verbal suggestion) or the minority (control verbal suggestion) of users. Subsequently, they imagined either their best possible health (positive imagery) or a typical day (control imagery). Sensitivity to pain, itch, and fatigue was tested using a cold pressor test, histamine iontophoresis, and a bicycle test, respectively. Heart rate and skin conductance were recorded continuously. Results showed that positive verbal suggestion and imagery successfully induced positive expectations, but they did not affect physical sensitivity, as indicated by sensitivity to pain, itch, or fatigue, or concurrent physiological responses. These results could indicate that the specificity and concreteness of expectation inductions might be important for their applicability in the treatment of physical symptoms.

trial registrationNederlands Trial Register NTR3641.

Indexed as

AdolescentCold TemperatureElectrocardiographyExerciseFatigueFemaleHeart RateHistamineHumansImagery, PsychotherapyMalePainPlacebo EffectPruritusSkinSkin Physiological PhenomenaHistamine

Identifiers

PMID26448183
PMCPMC4598027
OpenAlexW2198644313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.