ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015
Women's Awareness of Their Contraceptive Benefits Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prescription Contraceptive Sales Following the Affordable Care Act.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Article
- Motivations for Interest, Disinterest and Uncertainty in Intrauterine Device Use Among Young Women.Maternal and child health journal · 2017Article
- Ongoing Implementation Challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Contraceptive Mandate.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Early Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Uptake of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.Medical care · 2016Article
- Combined hormonal contraception use in reproductive-age women with contraindications to estrogen use.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2016Article
- Impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Overview.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Trends in Postpartum Contraceptive Use in 20 U.S. States and Jurisdictions: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2015-2018.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act mandates that there be no out-of-pocket cost for Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptive methods. Among 987 privately insured reproductive aged Pennsylvania women, fewer than 5% were aware that their insurance covered tubal sterilization, and only 11% were aware that they had full coverage for an intrauterine device. For the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate to affect effective contraception use and reduce unintended pregnancies, public awareness of the expanded benefits is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.