Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26447908›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

Continuing Need for Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics After the Affordable Care Act.

Karen W Hoover, Bradley W Parsell, Jami S Leichliter, Melissa A Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S Pearson, Thomas L Gift

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Medicaid Coverage of Sexually Transmitted Disease Service Visits.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen W HooverKaren W. Hoover, Jami S. Leichliter, Melissa A. Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, and Thomas L. Gift are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Bradley W. Parsell is with the National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.
Bradley W ParsellKaren W. Hoover, Jami S. Leichliter, Melissa A. Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, and Thomas L. Gift are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Bradley W. Parsell is with the National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.
Jami S LeichliterKaren W. Hoover, Jami S. Leichliter, Melissa A. Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, and Thomas L. Gift are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Bradley W. Parsell is with the National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.
Melissa A HabelKaren W. Hoover, Jami S. Leichliter, Melissa A. Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, and Thomas L. Gift are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Bradley W. Parsell is with the National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.
Guoyu TaoKaren W. Hoover, Jami S. Leichliter, Melissa A. Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, and Thomas L. Gift are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Bradley W. Parsell is with the National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.
William S PearsonKaren W. Hoover, Jami S. Leichliter, Melissa A. Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, and Thomas L. Gift are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Bradley W. Parsell is with the National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.
Thomas L GiftKaren W. Hoover, Jami S. Leichliter, Melissa A. Habel, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, and Thomas L. Gift are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Bradley W. Parsell is with the National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assessed the characteristics of sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic patients, their reasons for seeking health services in STD clinics, and their access to health care in other venues.

methodsIn 2013, we surveyed persons who used publicly funded STD clinics in 21 US cities with the highest STD morbidity.

resultsOf the 4364 STD clinic patients we surveyed, 58.5% were younger than 30 years, 72.5% were non-White, and 49.9% were uninsured. They visited the clinic for STD symptoms (18.9%), STD screening (33.8%), and HIV testing (13.6%). Patients chose STD clinics because of walk-in, same-day appointments (49.5%), low cost (23.9%), and expert care (8.3%). Among STD clinic patients, 60.4% had access to another type of venue for sick care, and 58.5% had access to another type of venue for preventive care. Most insured patients (51.6%) were willing to use insurance to pay for care at the STD clinic.

conclusionsDespite access to other health care settings, patients chose STD clinics for sexual health care because of convenient, low-cost, and expert care. Policy Implication. STD clinics play an important role in STD prevention by offering walk-in care to uninsured patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Protection and Affordable Care ActSafety-net ProvidersSexually Transmitted DiseasesSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26447908
PMCPMC4627523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.