ArticleTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2016
Which Users Should Be the Focus of Mobile Personal Health Records? Analysis of User Characteristics Influencing Usage of a Tethered Mobile Personal Health Record.
Article in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of encounters on patient app use: results of a tethered mobile personal health record usage pattern analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Quality of Care in Hospitals and the Use of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Applications: An Exploratory Study Using National Hospital Evaluation Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Computationally-guided Qualitative Analysis to Understand User Experiences with Different Types of Mobile Personal Health Records.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Effects of Patient-Generated Health Data: Comparison of Two Versions of Long-Term Mobile Personal Health Record Usage Logs.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Factors of quality of care and their association with smartphone based PHR adoption in South Korean hospitals.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- User Experience of Mobile Personal Health Records for the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems.Healthcare informatics research · 2020Article
- The Use of Mobile Personal Health Records for Hemoglobin A1c Regulation in Patients With Diabetes: Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Observational
- Managing Patient-Generated Health Data Through Mobile Personal Health Records: Analysis of Usage Data.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- Personal health records in the Netherlands: potential user preferences quantified by a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Personal Health Record Use in the United States: Forecasting Future Adoption Levels.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Article
- Hospitals' Adoption of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems and Patients' Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing National Healthcare Big Data.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was conducted to analyze the usage pattern of a hospital-tethered mobile personal health records (m-PHRs) application named My Chart in My Hand (MCMH) and to identify user characteristics that influence m-PHR usage. MATERIALS AND
methodsAccess logs to MCMH and its menus were collected for a total of 18 months, from August 2011 to January 2013. Usage patterns between users without a patient identification number (ID) and users with a patient ID were compared. Users with a patient ID were divided into light and heavy user groups by the median number of monthly access. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess MCMH usage pattern by characteristics of MCMH user with a patient ID.
resultsThe total number of MCMH logins was 105,603, and the median number of accesses was 15 times. Users (n = 7,096) mostly accessed the "My Chart" menu, but "OPD [outpatient department] Service Support" and "Health Management" menus were also frequently used. Patients with chronic diseases, experience of hospital visits including emergency room and OPD, and age group of 0-19 years were more frequently found among users with a patient ID (n = 2,186) (p < 0.001). A similar trend was found in the heavy user group (n = 1,123). Submenus of laboratory result, online appointment, and medication lists that were accessed mostly by users with a patient ID were associated with OPD visit and chronic diseases.
conclusionsThis study showed that focuses on patients with chronic disease and more hospital visits and empowerment functions in a tethered m-PHR would be helpful to pursue the extensive use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.