Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26447571›Full record

ReviewNeuron2015

Neurocognitive Architecture of Working Memory.

Johan Eriksson, Edward K Vogel, Anders Lansner, Fredrik Bergström, Lars Nyberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06723743 (Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Effects on Attention and Working Memory), which is not on this map. Cited by 247 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
247citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06723743 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Effects on Attention and Working Memory: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor College of MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI) PatientsArmsTranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for attention in veterans with TBI, Soterix Medical Vagus Nerve Stimulation mini-CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

247 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Spatial memory under emotion: Effects across encoding, maintenance and retrieval.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

187 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johan ErikssonDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden; Umeå Center for Function Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden. Electronic address: johan.eriksson@umu.se.
Edward K VogelDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Anders LansnerDepartment of Computational Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik BergströmDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden; Umeå Center for Function Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Lars NybergDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden; Umeå Center for Function Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden; Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

The Distinction Between Number and Resolution in Visual Working MemoryR01MH087214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI AWH, EDWARD, VOGEL, EDWARD K · 2009 to 2023
$11.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087214NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH087214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial role for working memory in temporary information processing and guidance of complex behavior has been recognized for many decades. There is emerging consensus that working-memory maintenance results from the interactions among long-term memory representations and basic processes, including attention, that are instantiated as reentrant loops between frontal and posterior cortical areas, as well as sub-cortical structures. The nature of such interactions can account for capacity limitations, lifespan changes, and restricted transfer after working-memory training. Recent data and models indicate that working memory may also be based on synaptic plasticity and that working memory can operate on non-consciously perceived information.

Indexed as

BrainFrontal LobeHumansMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermNeuronal PlasticityParietal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID26447571
PMCPMC4605545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.