Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26447127›Full record

ReviewGenetics2015

Drosophila as an In Vivo Model for Human Neurodegenerative Disease.

Leeanne McGurk, Amit Berson, Nancy M Bonini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cells · 2025
    Review
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Insects · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leeanne McGurkDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Amit BersonDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Nancy M BoniniDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 nbonini@sas.upenn.edu.

Funding

Epigenetic Changes associated with Neurodegenerative DiseasesR01NS078283 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BERGER, SHELLEY L, BONINI, NANCY M · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
Ataxin-2 as a genetic risk factor for ALS: New insights into neurodegenerationR01NS073660 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BONINI, NANCY M, GITLER, AARON D. · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Interplay of the microbiome and the brain in neurodegenerative diseaseR21NS088370 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BONINI, NANCY M · 2014 to 2015
$433k
Epigenetic mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegenerationF32NS084667 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BERSON, AMIT · 2013 to 2015
$159k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS084667NINDS NIH HHS F32-NS084667NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073660NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS0736690NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078283NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS078283NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS088370NINDS NIH HHS R21-NS088370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increase in the ageing population, neurodegenerative disease is devastating to families and poses a huge burden on society. The brain and spinal cord are extraordinarily complex: they consist of a highly organized network of neuronal and support cells that communicate in a highly specialized manner. One approach to tackling problems of such complexity is to address the scientific questions in simpler, yet analogous, systems. The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been proven tremendously valuable as a model organism, enabling many major discoveries in neuroscientific disease research. The plethora of genetic tools available in Drosophila allows for exquisite targeted manipulation of the genome. Due to its relatively short lifespan, complex questions of brain function can be addressed more rapidly than in other model organisms, such as the mouse. Here we discuss features of the fly as a model for human neurodegenerative disease. There are many distinct fly models for a range of neurodegenerative diseases; we focus on select studies from models of polyglutamine disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that illustrate the type and range of insights that can be gleaned. In discussion of these models, we underscore strengths of the fly in providing understanding into mechanisms and pathways, as a foundation for translational and therapeutic research.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterHumansMiceNeurodegenerative DiseasesPeptidesPeptidespolyglutamineALSDrosophilaFlyBookFTDgenetic pathwayspolyglutamine diseaseprotein toxicity

Identifiers

PMID26447127
PMCPMC4596656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.