Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446930›Full record

Trial reportProgress in orthodontics2015

Effect of single-dose low-level helium-neon laser irradiation on orthodontic pain: a split-mouth single-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.

Farhad Sobouti, Maziar Khatami, Nasim Chiniforush, Vahid Rakhshan, Mahsa Shariati

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Progress in orthodontics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Optimal management of orthodontic pain.Journal of pain research · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Orofacial Pains.Pain research & management · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Protocol of Low-level Laser Therapy in Orthodontic Practice: A Scoping Review of Literature.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Farhad SoboutiDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Faculty, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. farhad_sobouti@yahoo.com.
Maziar KhatamiDepartment of Periodontics, Dental Faculty, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. mzkhatami@gmail.com.
Nasim ChiniforushLaser Research Center of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. nasimch2002@yahoo.com.
Vahid RakhshanIranian Tissue Bank and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. vahid.rakhshan@gmail.com.
Mahsa ShariatiCraniomaxillofacial Surgery Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Postal Code: 14174, North Kargar Ave., 16 Azar ST, Tehran, Iran. mahsa.shariati@gmail.com.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRShariati Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is the most common complication of orthodontic treatment. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been suggested as a new analgesic treatment free of the adverse effects of analgesic medications. However, it is not studied thoroughly, and the available studies are quite controversial. Moreover, helium neon (He-Ne) laser has not been assessed before.

methodsThis split-mouth placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was performed on 16 male and 14 female orthodontic patients requiring bilateral upper canine retraction. The study was performed at a private clinic in Sari, Iran, in 2014. It was single blind: patients, orthodontist, and personnel were blinded of the allocations, but the laser operator (periodontist) was not blinded. Once canine retractor was activated, a randomly selected maxillary quarter received a single dose of He-Ne laser irradiation (632.8 nm, 10 mw, 6 j/cm(2) density). The other quarter served as the placebo side, treated by the same device but powered off. In the first, second, fourth, and seventh days, blinded patients rated their pain sensed on each side at home using visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires. There was no harm identified during or after the study. Pain changes were analyzed using two- and one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, Bonferroni, and t-test (α = 0.01, β > 0.99). This trial was not registered. It was self-funded by the authors.

resultsSixteen males and 11 females remained in the study (aged 12-21). Average pain scores sensed in all 4 intervals on control and laser sides were 4.06 ± 2.85 and 2.35 ± 1.77, respectively (t-test P < 0.0001). One-way ANOVA showed significant pain declines over time, in each group (P < 0.0001). Two-way ANOVA showed significant effects for LLLT (P < 0.0001) and time (P = <0.0001).

conclusionsSingle-dose He-Ne laser therapy might reduce orthodontic pain caused by retracting maxillary canines.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCuspidDental AlloysFemaleHumansLasers, GasLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMaxillaOrthodontic BracketsOrthodontic WiresPainPain MeasurementPlacebosSingle-Blind MethodDental AlloysPlacebosStainless SteelCanine retractionHelium-neon (He-Ne) laserLaser irradiationLow-level laser therapy (LLLT)Orthodontic painPlaceboVisual analog scale (VAS)

Identifiers

PMID26446930
PMCPMC4883614
OpenAlexW1748768580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.