Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446825›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2015

Patients presenting at the emergency department with acute abdominal pain are less likely to be admitted to inpatient wards at times of access block: a registry study.

M C Blom, M Landin-Olsson, M Lindsten, F Jonsson, K Ivarsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M C BlomDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, HS 32, EA-blocket, 2nd floor, SE-22185, Lund, Sweden. mathias.blom@med.lu.se.
M Landin-OlssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, HS 32, EA-blocket, 2nd floor, SE-22185, Lund, Sweden. mona.landin-olsson@med.lu.se.
M LindstenDepartment of Surgery, Ystad General Hospital, Kristianstadsvägen 3A, SE-27182, Ystad, Sweden.
F JonssonDepartment of Pre- and Intrahospital Emergency Medicine, Helsingborg General Hospital, S Vallgatan 5, SE-25187, Helsingborg, Sweden. Fredrik.N.Jonsson@skane.se.
K IvarssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, HS 32, EA-blocket, 2nd floor, SE-22185, Lund, Sweden. kjell.ivarsson@med.lu.se.
Lund University · SEHelsingborgs lasarett · SELasarettet i Ystad · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlso known as access block, shortage of inpatient beds is a common cause of emergency department (ED) boarding and overcrowding, which are both associated with impaired quality of care. Recent studies have suggested that access block not simply causes boarding in EDs, but may also result in that patients are less likely to be admitted to the hospital from the ED. The present study's aim was to investigate whether this effect remained for patients with acute abdominal pain, for which different management strategies have emerged. Access block was defined in terms of hospital occupancy and the appropriateness of ED discharges addressed as 72 h revisits to the ED.

methodsAs a registry study of ED administrative data, the study examined a population of patients who presented with acute abdominal pain at the ED of a 420-bed hospital in southern Sweden during 2011-2013. Associations between exposure and outcomes were addressed in contingency tables and by logistic regression models.

resultsCrude analysis revealed a negative association between access block and the probability of inpatient admission (38.6 % admitted at 0-95 % occupancy, 37.8 % at 95-100 % occupancy, and 35.0 % at ≥ 100 % occupancy) (p < .001). No significant associations between exposure and 72 h revisits emerged. Multivariable models indicated an odds ratio of inpatient admission of 0.992 (95 % CI: 0.986-0.997) per percentage increase in hospital occupancy.

conclusionsStudy findings indicate that patients with acute abdominal pain are less likely to be admitted to the hospital from the ED at times of access block and that other management strategies are employed instead. No association with 72 h revisits was seen, but future studies need to address more granular outcomes in order to clarify the safety aspects of the effect.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAbdomen, AcuteAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBed OccupancyCrowdingEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionRegistries

Identifiers

PMID26446825
PMCPMC4596503
OpenAlexW2121325235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.