Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446813›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Food provisioning alters infection dynamics in populations of a wild rodent.

Kristian M Forbes, Heikki Henttonen, Varpu Hirvelä-Koski, Anja Kipar, Tapio Mappes, Peter Stuart, Otso Huitu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reviewing the effects of food provisioning on wildlife immunity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Food for contagion: synthesis and future directions for studying host-parasite responses to resource shifts in anthropogenic environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristian M ForbesNatural Resources Institute Finland, Suonenjoki, Finland Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland kristian.forbes@helsinki.fi.
Heikki HenttonenNatural Resources Institute Finland, Vantaa, Finland.
Varpu Hirvelä-KoskiProduction Animal and Wildlife Health Research Unit, Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Oulu, Finland.
Anja KiparDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Infection Biology, Institute of Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Tapio MappesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Peter StuartNatural Resources Institute Finland, Suonenjoki, Finland Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Otso HuituNatural Resources Institute Finland, Suonenjoki, Finland.
Natural Resources Institute Finland · FIUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIFinnish Food Authority · FIUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While pathogens are often assumed to limit the growth of wildlife populations, experimental evidence for their effects is rare. A lack of food resources has been suggested to enhance the negative effects of pathogen infection on host populations, but this theory has received little investigation. We conducted a replicated two-factor enclosure experiment, with introduction of the bacterium Bordetella bronchiseptica and food supplementation, to evaluate the individual and interactive effects of pathogen infection and food availability on vole populations during a boreal winter. We show that prior to bacteria introduction, vole populations were limited by food availability. Bordetella bronchiseptica introduction then reduced population growth and abundance, but contrary to predictions, primarily in food supplemented populations. Infection prevalence and pathological changes in vole lungs were most common in food supplemented populations, and are likely to have resulted from increased congregation and bacteria transmission around feeding stations. Bordetella bronchiseptica-infected lungs often showed protozoan co-infection (consistent with Hepatozoon erhardovae), together with more severe inflammatory changes. Using a multidisciplinary approach, this study demonstrates a complex picture of interactions and underlying mechanisms, leading to population-level effects. Our results highlight the potential for food provisioning to markedly influence disease processes in wildlife mammal populations.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaeAnimalsBordetella bronchisepticaBordetella InfectionsDietDietary SupplementsFemaleFinlandMalePopulation DynamicsPopulation GrowthRandom AllocationRodent DiseasesSeasonsBordetella bronchisepticaco-infectionfactorial experimentfood supplementationpopulation limitationvole

Identifiers

PMID26446813
PMCPMC4614785
OpenAlexW2177951254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.