ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2015
The Value of Macrolide-Based Regimens for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Long-Term Macrolide Exposure on the Oropharyngeal Microbiome and Macrolide Resistance in Healthy Adults and Consequences for Onward Transmission of Resistance.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Trial
- Detection of Macrolide-ResistantThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024Article
- Disease-Specific Quality Indicators for Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Infections (ESAC Quality Indicators) Applied to Point Prevalence Audit Surveys in General Practices in 13 European Countries.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Moving Past the Routine Use of Macrolides-Reviewing the Role of Combination Therapy in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Current infectious disease reports · 2018Review
- Epidemiology, virulence factors and management of the pneumococcus.F1000Research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macrolide antimicrobials are commonly prescribed, specifically for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Although still effective, the development of widespread macrolide resistance has limited their use. Aside from their antimicrobial effects, macrolides are also known to possess immune-modulatory properties which may confer a survival benefit in both acute and chronic inflammatory states. This review discusses the efficacy, potential mechanisms, and adverse effects of macrolide therapy specifically in community-acquired pneumonia in outpatients, hospitalized ward patients, and those requiring intensive care unit admission. Challenges for ongoing research in this field are discussed and treatment recommendations offered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.