Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446463›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2015

Characterizing Protein Structure, Dynamics and Conformation in Lyophilized Solids.

Balakrishnan S Moorthy, Lavanya K Iyer, Elizabeth M Topp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding dry proteins and their protection with solid-state hydrogen-deuterium exchange.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protection by desiccation-tolerance proteins probed at the residue level.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Balakrishnan S Moorthy
Lavanya K Iyer
Elizabeth M ToppDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, Room 124D, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2091. topp@purdue.edu.

Funding

Protein Aggregation in Amorphous SolidsR01GM085293 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI TOPP, ELIZABETH M. · 2009 to 2016
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-term stability of protein therapeutics in the solid-state depends on the preservation of native structure during lyophilization and in the lyophilized powder. Proteins can reversibly or irreversibly unfold upon lyophilization, acquiring conformations susceptible to degradation during storage. Therefore, characterizing proteins in the dried state is crucial for the design of safe and efficacious formulations. This review summarizes the basic principles and applications of the analytical techniques that are commonly used to characterize protein structure, dynamics and conformation in lyophilized solids. The review also discusses the applications of recently developed mass spectrometry based methods (solid-state hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (ssHDX-MS) and solid-state photolytic labeling mass spectrometry (ssPL-MS)) and their ability to study proteins in the solid-state at high resolution.

Indexed as

Chemistry, PharmaceuticalProtein ConformationFreeze DryingHumansMass SpectrometryProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26446463
PMCPMC4671836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.