Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446427›Full record

ReviewAndrology2015

Cell-specific ablation in the testis: what have we learned?

L B Smith, P J O'Shaughnessy, D Rebourcet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Andrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Immune Regulation in the Testis and Epididymis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Inhibition ofCells · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. TCF21Nature communications · 2021
    Article
  15. Sperm proteins and cancer-testis antigens are released by the seminiferous tubules in mice and men.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterization of rodent Sertoli cell primary cultures.Molecular reproduction and development · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L B SmithMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
P J O'ShaughnessyCollege of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Garscube Campus, Glasgow, UK.
D RebourcetMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J015105/1Medical Research Council G1002033Medical Research Council G1100354Medical Research Council G1100354/1Medical Research Council G1100358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testicular development and function is the culmination of a complex process of autocrine, paracrine and endocrine interactions between multiple cell types. Dissecting this has classically involved the use of systemic treatments to perturb endocrine function, or more recently, transgenic models to knockout individual genes. However, targeting genes one at a time does not capture the more wide-ranging role of each cell type in its entirety. An often overlooked, but extremely powerful approach to elucidate cellular function is the use of cell ablation strategies, specifically removing one cellular population and examining the resultant impacts on development and function. Cell ablation studies reveal a more holistic overview of cell-cell interactions. This not only identifies important roles for the ablated cell type, which warrant further downstream study, but also, and importantly, reveals functions within the tissue that occur completely independently of the ablated cell type. To date, cell ablation studies in the testis have specifically removed germ cells, Leydig cells, macrophages and recently Sertoli cells. These studies have provided great leaps in understanding not possible via other approaches; as such, cell ablation represents an essential component in the researchers' tool-kit, and should be viewed as a complement to the more mainstream approaches to advancing our understanding of testis biology. In this review, we summarise the cell ablation models used in the testis, and discuss what each of these have taught us about testis development and function.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesAnimalsCell CommunicationHumansLeydig CellsMacrophagesMaleModels, AnimalSertoli CellsSignal TransductionSpermatogenesisSpermatozoaTestisanimal modelsgerm cellsgerm cell transplantationgonadal developmentLeydig cellsmacrophagesparacrine factorsSertoli cellspermatogenesistestis

Identifiers

PMID26446427
PMCPMC4950036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.