Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446221›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Fast Oscillatory Commands from the Motor Cortex Can Be Decoded by the Spinal Cord for Force Control.

Renato N Watanabe, Andre F Kohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reading and Modulating Cortical β Bursts from Motor Unit Spiking Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Only the Fastest Corticospinal Fibers Contribute to β Corticomuscular Coherence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Common Synaptic Input to Motor Neurons and Neural Drive to Targeted Reinnervated Muscles.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Renato N WatanabeLaboratorio de Engenharia Biomedica, Escola Politécnica and renato.watanabe@usp.br andfkohn@leb.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-6543
Andre F KohnLaboratorio de Engenharia Biomedica, Escola Politécnica and Neuroscience Program, Universidade de São Paulo, CEP 05508-010, São Paulo, Brazil renato.watanabe@usp.br andfkohn@leb.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9770-3348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oscillations in the beta and gamma bands (13-30 Hz; 35-70 Hz) have often been observed in motor cortical outputs that reach the spinal cord, acting on motoneurons and interneurons. However, the frequencies of these oscillations are above the muscle force frequency range. A current view is that the transformation of the motoneuron pool inputs into force is linear. For this reason possible roles for these oscillations are unclear, since if this transformation is linear, the high frequencies in the motoneuron inputs (e.g., 20 Hz from pyramidal tract neurons) would be filtered out by the muscle and have no effect on force control. A biologically inspired mathematical model of the neuromuscular system was used to investigate the impact of high-frequency cortical oscillatory activity on force control. The model simulation results evidenced that a typical motoneuron pool has a nonlinear behavior that enables the decoding of a high-frequency oscillatory input. An input at a single frequency (e.g., beta band) leads to an increase in the steady-state force generated by the muscle. When the input oscillation was amplitude modulated at a given low frequency, the force oscillated at this frequency. In both cases, the mechanism relies on the recruitment and derecruitment of motor units in response to the oscillatory descending drive. Therefore, the results from this study suggest a potential role in force control for cortical oscillations at frequencies at or above the beta band, despite the low-pass behavior of the muscles. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The role of cortical oscillations in motor control has been a long-standing question, one view being that they are an epiphenomenon. Fast oscillations are known to reach the spinal cord, and hence they have been thought to affect muscle behavior. However, experimental limitations have hampered further advances to explain how they could influence muscle force. An approach for such a challenge was adopted in the present research: to study the problem through computer simulations of an advanced biologically compatible mathematical model. Using such a model, we found that the well-known mechanism of recruitment and derecruitment of the spinal cord motoneurons can allow the muscle to respond to cortical oscillations, suggesting that these oscillations are not epiphenomena in motor control.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsComputer SimulationHumansModels, NeurologicalMotor CortexMotor NeuronsNeural PathwaysSpinal Cordconductance-based modelcortical oscillationforce controlmotoneuronmotor controlsimulation

Identifiers

PMID26446221
PMCPMC6605389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.