Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446142›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2015

Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs.

Nikolai Petrovsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 349 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Global vaccine development.Nature medicine · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolai PetrovskyDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. nikolai.petrovsky@flinders.edu.au.
Flinders University · AU

Funding

Novel vaccine adjuvants to counter bioterrorist threatsU01AI061142 · NIAID · FLINDERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA · PI PETROVSKY, NIKOLAI · 2005 to 2009
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800039CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400053CNIAID NIH HHS U01 AI061142PHS HHS HHSN272200800039CPHS HHS HHSN272201400053C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of highly pure antigens to improve vaccine safety has led to reduced vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy. This has led to the need to use adjuvants to improve vaccine immunogenicity. The ideal adjuvant should maximize vaccine immunogenicity without compromising tolerability or safety. Unfortunately, adjuvant research has lagged behind other vaccine areas such as antigen discovery, with the consequence that only a very limited number of adjuvants based on aluminium salts, monophosphoryl lipid A and oil emulsions are currently approved for human use. Recent strategic initiatives to support adjuvant development by the National Institutes of Health should translate into greater adjuvant choices in the future. Mechanistic studies have been valuable for better understanding of adjuvant action, but mechanisms of adjuvant toxicity are less well understood. The inflammatory or danger-signal model of adjuvant action implies that increased vaccine reactogenicity is the inevitable price for improved immunogenicity. Hence, adjuvant reactogenicity may be avoidable only if it is possible to separate inflammation from adjuvant action. The biggest remaining challenge in the adjuvant field is to decipher the potential relationship between adjuvants and rare vaccine adverse reactions, such as narcolepsy, macrophagic myofasciitis or Alzheimer's disease. While existing adjuvants based on aluminium salts have a strong safety record, there are ongoing needs for new adjuvants and more intensive research into adjuvants and their effects.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsForecastingHumansVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccines

Identifiers

PMID26446142
PMCPMC4615573
OpenAlexW1895518456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.