ArticleInternational journal of public health2015
Are spouses' socio-economic classifications interchangeable? Examining the consequences of a commonly used practice in studies on social inequalities in health.
Article in International journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating trends in working life expectancy based on health insurance data from Germany - Challenges and advantages.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- The effects of different lookback periods on the sociodemographic structure of the study population and on the estimation of incidence rates: analyses with German claims data.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Observational
- Socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes in employed individuals, nonworking spouses and pensioners.SSM - population health · 2020Article
- Health inequalities in terms of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality: a study with German claims data covering 2006 to 2015.International journal of public health · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIndicators of socio-economic position are not always available for all subjects. To avoid losses of large parts of study populations, missing data are replaced by spouses' information. Despite this commonly practiced solution, systematic analyses of the consequences on substantive results of studies are rare. We examined the consequences of assigning the educational position of subjects to their partners.
methodsGerman statutory health insurance data from 2005 (N = 1,801,744) and 2011 (N = 1,987,707) were used. Diagnoses of type 2 diabetes were used as outcome. Effects were examined in terms of differences in diabetes prevalence and by the reproduction of social gradients in women and men as compared to their partners.
resultsSocial gradients were reproduced for subjects and for their partners, but diabetes prevalences were higher in partners.
conclusionsFrom a pragmatic point of view the practice of replacing missing information by spouses' information turned out as viable. However, the usefulness of this solution has to be examined in every case anew, because it may not be suitable for every health-related outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.