Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26446072›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2015

Randomised controlled trial of weaning strategies for preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

Jessica Tang, Shelley Reid, Tracey Lutz, Girvan Malcolm, Sue Oliver, David Andrew Osborn

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Sudden versus gradual pressure wean from Nasal CPAP in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation weaning protocol in neonatal intensive care units in Brazil: a descriptive study.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017
    Review
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica TangUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. j.tang114@gmail.com.
Shelley ReidRPA Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. Shelley.Reid@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Tracey LutzDiscipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. tracey.lutz@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Girvan MalcolmDiscipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. girvan.malcolm@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Sue OliverRPA Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. sue.oliver@live.com.
David Andrew OsbornRPA Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. david.osborn@sydney.edu.au.
University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal strategy for weaning very preterm infants from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is unclear. Reported strategies include weaning NCPAP to a predefined pressure then trialling stopping completely (abrupt wean); alternate periods of increased time off NCPAP whilst reducing time on until the infant is completely weaned (gradual wean); and using high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to assist the weaning process. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal weaning from NCPAP strategy for very preterm infants.

methodsA pilot single centre, factorial design, 4-arm randomised controlled trial. Sixty infants born <30 weeks gestation meeting stability criteria on NCPAP were randomly allocated to one of four groups. Group 1: abrupt wean with HFNC; Group 2: abrupt wean without HFNC; Group 3: gradual wean with HFNC; Group 4: gradual wean without HFNC. The primary outcomes were duration of respiratory support, chronic lung disease, length of hospital stay and time to full suck feeds.

resultsThe primary outcome measures were not significantly different between groups. Group 1 had a significant reduction in duration of NCPAP (group 1: median 1 day; group 2: 24 days; group 3: 15 days; group 4: 24 days; p = 0.002) and earlier corrected gestational age off NCPAP. There was a significant difference in rate of parental withdrawal from the study, with group 2 having the highest rate. Group 3 had a significantly increased duration on HFNC compared to group 1.

conclusionsUse of high flow nasal cannula may be effective at weaning infants from NCPAP but did not reduce duration of respiratory support or time to full suck feeds. Abrupt wean without the use of HFNC was associated with an increased rate of withdrawal by parent request.

trial registrationThis study is registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( www.anzctr.org.au/). (Registration Number =  ACTRN12610001003066).

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureInfant, PrematureFeeding BehaviorFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornLength of StayMalePilot ProjectsTime FactorsVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID26446072
PMCPMC4597764
OpenAlexW1920248770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.