SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2016
Genetic Biomarkers of Barrett's Esophagus Susceptibility and Progression to Dysplasia and Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of epigenetic biomarkers in progression from non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Histological evaluation of PAXgene tissue fixation in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma diagnostics.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Evolutionary dynamics in Barrett oesophagus: implications for surveillance, risk stratification and therapy.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
- Somatic DNA copy number alterations in non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Clinical significance of enterocyte-specific gene polymorphisms as candidate markers of oxaliplatin-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Article
- The antioxidant response in Barrett's tumorigenesis: A double-edged sword.Redox biology · 2021Review
- Molecular biomarker identification for esophageal adenocarcinoma using endoscopic brushing and magnified endoscopy.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021Article
- Is Malignant Potential of Barrett's Esophagus Predictable by Endoscopy Findings?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- CDX-2 Expression in Esophageal Biopsies Without Goblet Cell Intestinal Metaplasia May Be Predictive of Barrett's Esophagus.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- Predictors of Progression in Barrett's Esophagus.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic transgastric stapler-assisted circumferential esophageal mucosectomy and simultaneous fundoplication in a pig model.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2018Article
- Article
- Circulating Tumor Cells in the Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common and important precursor lesion of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). A third of patients with BE are asymptomatic, and our ability to predict the risk of progression of metaplasia to dysplasia and EAC (and therefore guide management) is limited. There is an urgent need for clinically useful biomarkers of susceptibility to both BE and risk of subsequent progression. This study aims to systematically identify, review, and meta-analyze genetic biomarkers reported to predict both. A systematic review of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed in May 2014. Study and evidence quality were appraised using the revised American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, and modified Recommendations for Tumor Marker Scores. Meta-analysis was performed for all markers assessed by more than one study. A total of 251 full-text articles were reviewed; 52 were included. A total of 33 germline markers of susceptibility were identified (level of evidence II-III); 17 were included. Five somatic markers of progression were identified; meta-analysis demonstrated significant associations for chromosomal instability (level of evidence II). One somatic marker of progression/relapse following photodynamic therapy was identified. However, a number of failings of methodology and reporting were identified. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate genetic biomarkers of BE susceptibility and risk of progression. While a number of limitations of study quality temper the utility of those markers identified, some-in particular, those identified by genome-wide association studies, and chromosomal instability for progression-appear plausible, although robust validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.