Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445852›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2016

Genetic Biomarkers of Barrett's Esophagus Susceptibility and Progression to Dysplasia and Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

John M Findlay, Mark R Middleton, Ian Tomlinson

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Predictors of Progression in Barrett's Esophagus.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  11. Feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic transgastric stapler-assisted circumferential esophageal mucosectomy and simultaneous fundoplication in a pig model.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Circulating Tumor Cells in the Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John M FindlayWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK. john.findlay@oncology.ox.ac.uk.
Mark R MiddletonNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, The Joint Research Office, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Ian TomlinsonWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16459Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common and important precursor lesion of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). A third of patients with BE are asymptomatic, and our ability to predict the risk of progression of metaplasia to dysplasia and EAC (and therefore guide management) is limited. There is an urgent need for clinically useful biomarkers of susceptibility to both BE and risk of subsequent progression. This study aims to systematically identify, review, and meta-analyze genetic biomarkers reported to predict both. A systematic review of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed in May 2014. Study and evidence quality were appraised using the revised American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, and modified Recommendations for Tumor Marker Scores. Meta-analysis was performed for all markers assessed by more than one study. A total of 251 full-text articles were reviewed; 52 were included. A total of 33 germline markers of susceptibility were identified (level of evidence II-III); 17 were included. Five somatic markers of progression were identified; meta-analysis demonstrated significant associations for chromosomal instability (level of evidence II). One somatic marker of progression/relapse following photodynamic therapy was identified. However, a number of failings of methodology and reporting were identified. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate genetic biomarkers of BE susceptibility and risk of progression. While a number of limitations of study quality temper the utility of those markers identified, some-in particular, those identified by genome-wide association studies, and chromosomal instability for progression-appear plausible, although robust validation is required.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypePrecancerous ConditionsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeGenetic MarkersBarrett’s esophagusBiomarkersEsophageal cancerEsophageal dysplasiaGenetic

Identifiers

PMID26445852
PMCPMC4700058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.