Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445596›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology2015

The efficacy and safety of mirabegron compared with solifenacin in overactive bladder patients dissatisfied with previous antimuscarinic treatment due to lack of efficacy: results of a noninferiority, randomized, phase IIIb trial.

Jose E Batista, Heinz Kölbl, Sender Herschorn, Tomasz Rechberger, Javier Cambronero, Michael Halaska, Alex Coppell, Mathilde Kaper, Moses Huang, Emad Siddiqui and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mirabegron and Anticholinergics in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mirabegron in the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome.International journal of women's health · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Jose E BatistaUrodynamics Unit, URD Hospital Quiron Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
Heinz KölblDepartment of General Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Sender HerschornDepartment of Surgery/Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tomasz RechbergerII Department of Gynaecology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland.
Javier CambroneroDepartment of Urology, Infanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Michael HalaskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alex CoppellAstellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Chertsey, Surrey.
Mathilde KaperDepartment of Biostatistics, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Leiden, Netherlands.
Moses HuangAstellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Chertsey, Surrey.
Emad SiddiquiAstellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Chertsey, Surrey.
BEYOND study group
Astellas Pharma (Germany) · DEAstellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLCharles University · CZHospital Quirón Teknon · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESMedical University of Lublin · PLMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg in overactive bladder (OAB) patients dissatisfied with previous antimuscarinic treatment due to lack of efficacy. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis randomized, double-blind, phase IIIb, noninferiority study, enrolled male and female patients aged ⩾18 years old, with symptoms of OAB for ⩾3 months, who were dissatisfied with their previous antimuscarinic drug due to lack of efficacy. A total of 1887 patients were randomized to receive mirabegron 50 mg (n = 943) or solifenacin 5 mg (n = 944) daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to end of treatment in mean number of micturitions/24 h. Noninferiority was confirmed if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference between solifenacin and mirabegron was > -0.20. Secondary efficacy endpoints, which included change from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h, urgency incontinence episodes/24 h, urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4)/24 h and nocturia episodes/24 h, were analyzed using analysis of covariance.

resultsFor the primary endpoint, adjusted mean treatment difference (95% CI) in mean number of micturitions/24 h was -0.18 (-0.42, 0.06) and therefore noninferiority of mirabegron to solifenacin was not demonstrated. Both treatments demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in efficacy variables and were well tolerated, with a lower incidence of dry mouth with mirabegron.

conclusionsNoninferiority of mirabegron compared with solifenacin for reduction in micturition frequency could not be demonstrated in this population of OAB patients who were dissatisfied with previous antimuscarinic therapy due to lack of efficacy. Both mirabegron and solifenacin improved key OAB symptoms with no statistically significant differences observed between the two treatments. Both drugs were well tolerated.

Indexed as

mirabegronnoninferiorityoveractive bladdersolifenacin

Identifiers

PMID26445596
PMCPMC4580095
OpenAlexW2096198028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.