Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445464›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Toxicogenomic Screening of Replacements for Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) Using the Immortalized TM4 Sertoli Cell Line.

Thomas C Nardelli, Hanno C Erythropel, Bernard Robaire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In vitro models of the male reproductive system: applications for developmental and reproductive toxicology.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alteration of the NEpigenomics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas C NardelliDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Hanno C ErythropelDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Bernard RobaireDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research RHF100626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phthalate plasticizers such as di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) are being phased out of many consumer products because of their endocrine disrupting properties and their ubiquitous presence in the environment. The concerns raised from the use of phthalates have prompted consumers, government, and industry to find alternative plasticizers that are safe, biodegradable, and have the versatility for multiple commercial applications. We examined the toxicogenomic profile of mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP, the active metabolite of DEHP), the commercial plasticizer diisononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH), and three recently proposed plasticizers: 1,4-butanediol dibenzoate (BDB), dioctyl succinate (DOS), and dioctyl maleate (DOM), using the immortalized TM4 Sertoli cell line. Results of gene expression studies revealed that DOS and BDB clustered with control samples while MEHP, DINCH and DOM were distributed far away from the control-DOS-BDB cluster, as determined by principle component analysis. While no significant changes in gene expression were found after treatment with BDB and DOS, treatment with MEHP, DINCH and DOM resulted in many differentially expressed genes. MEHP upregulated genes downstream of PPAR and targeted pathways of cholesterol biosynthesis without modulating the expression of PPAR's themselves. DOM upregulated genes involved in glutathione stress response, DNA repair, and cholesterol biosynthesis. Treatment with DINCH resulted in altered expression of a large number of genes involved in major signal transduction pathways including ERK/MAPK and Rho signalling. These data suggest DOS and BDB may be safer alternatives to DEHP/MEHP than DOM or the commercial alternative DINCH.

Indexed as

BenzidinesCell LineCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDicarboxylic AcidsDiethylhexyl PhthalateEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposureHumansMaleMaleatesPhthalic AcidsPlasticizersSertoli CellsSignal TransductionToxicogeneticsBenzidinesbis(diazo)benzidineCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDicarboxylic AcidsDiethylhexyl Phthalatediisononyl 1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic aciddioctyl maleateEndocrine DisruptorsMaleatesmono-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatephthalic acidPhthalic AcidsPlasticizers

Identifiers

PMID26445464
PMCPMC4596883
OpenAlexW1826261315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.