Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445451›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Multi-Trait GWAS and New Candidate Genes Annotation for Growth Curve Parameters in Brahman Cattle.

Aline Camporez Crispim, Matthew John Kelly, Simone Eliza Facioni Guimarães, Fabyano Fonseca e Silva, Marina Rufino Salinas Fortes, Raphael Rocha Wenceslau, Stephen Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modeling soybean growth: A mixed model approach.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline Camporez CrispimDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Matthew John KellyQueensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Simone Eliza Facioni GuimarãesDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fabyano Fonseca e SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marina Rufino Salinas FortesSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Raphael Rocha WenceslauAnimal Science Institute, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Stephen MooreQueensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRAgriculture and Food · AUUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the genetic architecture of beef cattle growth cannot be limited simply to the genome-wide association study (GWAS) for body weight at any specific ages, but should be extended to a more general purpose by considering the whole growth trajectory over time using a growth curve approach. For such an approach, the parameters that are used to describe growth curves were treated as phenotypes under a GWAS model. Data from 1,255 Brahman cattle that were weighed at birth, 6, 12, 15, 18, and 24 months of age were analyzed. Parameter estimates, such as mature weight (A) and maturity rate (K) from nonlinear models are utilized as substitutes for the original body weights for the GWAS analysis. We chose the best nonlinear model to describe the weight-age data, and the estimated parameters were used as phenotypes in a multi-trait GWAS. Our aims were to identify and characterize associated SNP markers to indicate SNP-derived candidate genes and annotate their function as related to growth processes in beef cattle. The Brody model presented the best goodness of fit, and the heritability values for the parameter estimates for mature weight (A) and maturity rate (K) were 0.23 and 0.32, respectively, proving that these traits can be a feasible alternative when the objective is to change the shape of growth curves within genetic improvement programs. The genetic correlation between A and K was -0.84, indicating that animals with lower mature body weights reached that weight at younger ages. One hundred and sixty seven (167) and two hundred and sixty two (262) significant SNPs were associated with A and K, respectively. The annotated genes closest to the most significant SNPs for A had direct biological functions related to muscle development (RAB28), myogenic induction (BTG1), fetal growth (IL2), and body weights (APEX2); K genes were functionally associated with body weight, body height, average daily gain (TMEM18), and skeletal muscle development (SMN1). Candidate genes emerging from this GWAS may inform the search for causative mutations that could underpin genomic breeding for improved growth rates.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsBody WeightCattleEndonucleasesGenomeGenotypeHaplotypesInterleukin-2Membrane ProteinsMutationPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Locirab GTP-Binding ProteinsSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinEndonucleasesInterleukin-2Membrane Proteinsrab GTP-Binding ProteinsSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID26445451
PMCPMC4622042
OpenAlexW2157180576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.