Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445437›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance.

Ahmad I M Athamneh, Alexander X Cartagena-Rivera, Arvind Raman, Daniel M Suter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Measuring Retrograde Actin Flow in Neuronal Growth Cones.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Manipulation of Axonal Outgrowth via Exogenous Low Forces.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Tissue mechanics, an important regulator of development and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. An Integrated Cytoskeletal Model of Neurite Outgrowth.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Quantifying mechanical force in axonal growth and guidance.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmad I M AthamnehDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Alexander X Cartagena-RiveraBirck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Arvind RamanBirck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Daniel M SuterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; Bindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Electronic address: dsuter@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pulling forces have been observed in axonal growth for several decades, their underlying mechanisms, absolute magnitudes, and exact roles are not well understood. In this study, using two different experimental approaches, we quantified retrograde traction force in Aplysia californica neuronal growth cones as they develop over time in response to a new adhesion substrate. In the first approach, we developed a novel method, to our knowledge, for measuring traction forces using an atomic force microscope (AFM) with a cantilever that was modified with an Aplysia cell adhesion molecule (apCAM)-coated microbead. In the second approach, we used force-calibrated glass microneedles coated with apCAM ligands to guide growth cone advance. The traction force exerted by the growth cone was measured by monitoring the microneedle deflection using an optical microscope. Both approaches showed that Aplysia growth cones can develop traction forces in the 10(0)-10(2) nN range during adhesion-mediated advance. Moreover, our results suggest that the level of traction force is directly correlated to the stiffness of the microneedle, which is consistent with a reinforcement mechanism previously observed in other cell types. Interestingly, the absolute level of traction force did not correlate with growth cone advance toward the adhesion site, but the amount of microneedle deflection did. In cases of adhesion-mediated growth cone advance, the mean needle deflection was 1.05 ± 0.07 μm. By contrast, the mean deflection was significantly lower (0.48 ± 0.06 μm) when the growth cones did not advance. Our data support a hypothesis that adhesion complexes, which can undergo micron-scale elastic deformation, regulate the coupling between the retrogradely flowing actin cytoskeleton and apCAM substrates, stimulating growth cone advance if sufficiently abundant.

Indexed as

ElasticityActinsAnimalsAplysiaCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCell MovementCells, CulturedGlassGrowth ConesMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMicrospheresNeuronsOptical ImagingActinsCell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID26445437
PMCPMC4601092
OpenAlexW2173748825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.