Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445433›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Decoding Cytoskeleton-Anchored and Non-Anchored Receptors from Single-Cell Adhesion Force Data.

Ediz Sariisik, Cvetan Popov, Jochen P Müller, Denitsa Docheva, Hauke Clausen-Schaumann, Martin Benoit

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inside-out regulation of E-cadherin conformation and adhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Plakophilin 1 but not plakophilin 3 regulates desmoglein clustering.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ediz SariisikExperimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Center for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Center for Applied Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Cvetan PopovExperimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Jochen P MüllerCenter for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Denitsa DochevaExperimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Center for Applied Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Hauke Clausen-SchaumannCenter for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Center for Applied Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Martin BenoitCenter for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Center for Applied Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: martin.benoit@physik.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DECenter for NanoScience · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary to parameters established for cell-adhesion force curve analysis, we evaluated the slope before a force step together with the distance from the surface at which the step occurs and visualized the result in a two-dimensional density plot. This new tool allows detachment steps of long membrane tethers to be distinguished from shorter jumplike force steps, which are typical for cytoskeleton-anchored bonds. A prostate cancer cell line (PC3) immobilized on an atomic-force-microscopy sensor interacted with three different substrates: collagen-I (Col-I), bovine serum albumin, and a monolayer of bone marrow-derived stem cells (SCP1). To address PC3 cells' predominant Col-I binding molecules, an antibody-blocking β1-integrin was used. Untreated PC3 cells on Col-I or SCP1 cells, which express Col-I, predominantly showed jumps in their force curves, while PC3 cells on bovine-serum-albumin- and antibody-treated PC3 cells showed long membrane tethers. The probability density plots thus revealed that β1-integrin-specific interactions are predominately anchored to the cytoskeleton, while the nonspecific interactions are mainly membrane-anchored. Experiments with latrunculin-A-treated PC3 cells corroborated these observations. The plots thus reveal details of the anchoring of bonds to the cell and provide a better understanding of receptor-ligand interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCattleCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MembraneCollagenCytoskeletonIntegrin alpha1beta1MaleMicroscopy, Atomic ForceProstatic NeoplasmsSerum Albumin, BovineStem CellsCollagenIntegrin alpha1beta1Serum Albumin, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID26445433
PMCPMC4601042
OpenAlexW2179218090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.