Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445426›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2016

Spin echo versus stimulated echo diffusion tensor imaging of the in vivo human heart.

Constantin von Deuster, Christian T Stoeck, Martin Genet, David Atkinson, Sebastian Kozerke

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diffusion MRI of the Body: Beyond PGSE-EPI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The relationship between myocardial microstructure and strain in chronic infarction using cardiovascular magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and feature tracking.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Constantin von DeusterImaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christian T StoeckImaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Martin GenetInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David AtkinsonCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sebastian KozerkeImaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency and diffusion tensor metrics of cardiac diffusion tensor mapping using acceleration-compensated spin-echo (SE) and stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) imaging.

methodsDiffusion weighted SE and STEAM sequences were implemented on a clinical 1.5 Tesla MR system. The SNR efficiency of SE and STEAM was measured (b = 50-450 s/mm(2) ) in isotropic agar, anisotropic diffusion phantoms and the in vivo human heart. Diffusion tensor analysis was performed on mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, helix and transverse angles.

resultsIn the isotropic phantom, the ratio of SNR efficiency for SE versus STEAM, SNRt (SE/STEAM), was 2.84 ± 0.08 for all tested b-values. In the anisotropic diffusion phantom the ratio decreased from 2.75 ± 0.05 to 2.20 ± 0.13 with increasing b-value, similar to the in vivo decrease from 2.91 ± 0.43 to 2.30 ± 0.30. Diffusion tensor analysis revealed reduced deviation of helix angles from a linear transmural model and reduced transverse angle standard deviation for SE compared with STEAM. Mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy were measured to be statistically different (P < 0.001) between SE and STEAM.

conclusionCardiac DTI using motion-compensated SE yields a 2.3-2.9× increase in SNR efficiency relative to STEAM and improved accuracy of tensor metrics. The SE method hence presents an attractive alternative to STEAM based approaches. Magn Reson Med 76:862-872, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesDiffusion Tensor ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingHeartHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise RatioSpin LabelsSpin Labelscardiac diffusion tensor imagingmyocardial fiber architecturesignal-to-noise ratiospin-echo, motion compensationSTEAM

Identifiers

PMID26445426
PMCPMC4989478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.