Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445111›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Hoopoe's Uropygial Gland Hosts a Bacterial Community Influenced by the Living Conditions of the Bird.

Sonia M Rodríguez-Ruano, Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, Antonio M Martín-Platero, J Pablo López-López, Juan M Peralta-Sánchez, Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez, Juan J Soler, Eva Valdivia, Manuel Martínez-Bueno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring theCurrent zoology · 2021
    Article
  8. Great Tit (Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolutionary Biology Needs Wild Microbiomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sonia M Rodríguez-RuanoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Manuel Martín-VivaldiDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Antonio M Martín-PlateroDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
J Pablo López-LópezDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Juan M Peralta-SánchezDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Magdalena Ruiz-RodríguezDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), Almería, Spain.
Juan J SolerDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), Almería, Spain.
Eva ValdiviaDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Manuel Martínez-BuenoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular methods have revealed that symbiotic systems involving bacteria are mostly based on whole bacterial communities. Bacterial diversity in hoopoe uropygial gland secretion is known to be mainly composed of certain strains of enterococci, but this conclusion is based solely on culture-dependent techniques. This study, by using culture-independent techniques (based on the 16S rDNA and the ribosomal intergenic spacer region) shows that the bacterial community in the uropygial gland secretion is more complex than previously thought and its composition is affected by the living conditions of the bird. Besides the known enterococci, the uropygial gland hosts other facultative anaerobic species and several obligated anaerobic species (mostly clostridia). The bacterial assemblage of this community was largely invariable among study individuals, although differences were detected between captive and wild female hoopoes, with some strains showing significantly higher prevalence in wild birds. These results alter previous views on the hoopoe-bacteria symbiosis and open a new window to further explore this system, delving into the possible sources of symbiotic bacteria (e.g. nest environments, digestive tract, winter quarters) or the possible functions of different bacterial groups in different contexts of parasitism or predation of their hoopoe host.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsEnterococcusFemaleResidence CharacteristicsScent GlandsSocial ConditionsSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID26445111
PMCPMC4596831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.