ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015
Patterns in PARTNERing across Public Health Collaboratives.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An integrative perspective on interorganizational multilevel healthcare networks: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Interorganizational Networks in Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Network development in workplace health promotion - empirically based insights from a cross-company network promoting physical activity in Germany.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Catalyzing alignment and systems transformation through cross-sector partnerships: Findings from the California Accountable Communities for Health Initiative.Health services research · 2024Observational
- Mapping the Lay of the Land: Using Interactive Network Analytic Tools for Collaboration in Rural Cancer Prevention and Control.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Article
- Applying network analysis to assess the development and sustainability of multi-sector coalitions.PloS one · 2022Article
- Reflections on benefits and challenges of longitudinal organisational network analysis as a tool for health systems research and practice.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- How to disseminate national recommendations for physical activity: a qualitative analysis of critical change agents in Germany.Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
- Physical activity promotion in an urban district: Analyzing the mechanisms of interorganizational cooperation.PloS one · 2021Article
- Assessing Collaboration in a National Research Partnership in Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care: A Network Approach.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Partnership capacity for community health improvement plan implementation: findings from a social network analysis.BMC public health · 2016Article
- The Ties That Bind: The Relationships Among Members in Nine Ohio HEALing Communities Coalitions.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- An Innovative Network Approach to Coordinating a National Effort to Improve Cardiovascular Health: The Case of Million Hearts.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Multisector Health Policy Networks in 15 Large US Cities.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inter-organizational networks represent one of the most promising practice-based approaches in public health as a way to attain resources, share knowledge, and, in turn, improve population health outcomes. However, the interdependencies and effectiveness related to the structure, management, and costs of these networks represents a critical item to be addressed. The objective of this research is to identify and determine the extent to which potential partnering patterns influence the structure of collaborative networks. This study examines data collected by PARTNER, specifically public health networks (n = 162), to better understand the structured relationships and interactions among public health organizations and their partners, in relation to collaborative activities. Combined with descriptive analysis, we focus on the composition of public health collaboratives in a series of Exponential Random Graph (ERG) models to examine the partnerships between different organization types to identify the attribute-based effects promoting the formation of network ties within and across collaboratives. We found high variation within and between these collaboratives including composition, diversity, and interactions. The findings of this research suggest common and frequent types of partnerships, as well as opportunities to develop new collaborations. The result of this analysis offer additional evidence to inform and strengthen public health practice partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.