Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26445051›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Unraveling Health Risk and Speciation of Arsenic from Groundwater in Rural Areas of Punjab, Pakistan.

Muhammad Bilal Shakoor, Nabeel Khan Niazi, Irshad Bibi, Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman, Ravi Naidu, Zhaomin Dong, Muhammad Shahid, Muhammad Arshad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Bilal ShakoorInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan. bilalshakoor88@gmail.com.
Nabeel Khan NiaziInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan. nabeelkniazi@gmail.com.
Irshad BibiInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan. irshad.niazi81@gmail.com.
Mohammad Mahmudur RahmanCentre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation (CERAR), Mawson Lakes Campus, University of South Australia, SA 5095, Australia. mohammad.rahman@unisa.edu.au.
Ravi NaiduGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. ravi.naidu@newcastle.edu.au.
Zhaomin DongGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. morrow.dong@newcastle.edu.au.
Muhammad ShahidDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Vehari 61100, Pakistan. muhammadshahid@ciitvehari.edu.pk.
Muhammad ArshadInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan. arshad_ises@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study determined the total and speciated arsenic (As) concentrations and other health-related water quality parameters for unraveling the health risk of As from drinking water to humans. Groundwater samples (n = 62) were collected from three previously unexplored rural areas (Chichawatni, Vehari, Rahim Yar Khan) of Punjab in Pakistan. The mean and median As concentrations in groundwater were 37.9 and 12.7 µg·L(-1) (range = 1.5-201 µg·L(-1)). Fifty three percent groundwater samples showed higher As value than WHO safe limit of 10 µg·L(-1). Speciation of As in groundwater samples (n = 13) showed the presence of inorganic As only; arsenite (As(III)) constituted 13%-67% of total As and arsenate (As(V)) ranged from 33% to 100%. For As health risk assessment, the hazard quotient and cancer risk values were 11-18 and 46-600 times higher than the recommended values of US-EPA (i.e., 1.00 and 10(-6), respectively). In addition to As, various water quality parameters (e.g., electrical conductivity, Na, Ca, Cl(-), NO₃(-), SO₄(2-), Fe, Mn, Pb) also enhanced the health risk. The results show that consumption of As-contaminated groundwater poses an emerging health threat to the communities in the study area, and hence needs urgent remedial and management measures.

Indexed as

AdultArsenicDrinking WaterFemaleGroundwaterHumansMalePakistanRisk AssessmentWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater QualityArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalarseniccancercontaminationgroundwaterhealth riskspeciationtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID26445051
PMCPMC4626974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.