Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26444412›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2015

Integration of molecular cytogenetics, dated molecular phylogeny, and model-based predictions to understand the extreme chromosome reorganization in the Neotropical genus Tonatia (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae).

Cibele G Sotero-Caio, Marianne Volleth, Federico G Hoffmann, LuAnn Scott, Holly A Wichman, Fengtang Yang, Robert J Baker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. High-density linkage maps and chromosome level genome assemblies unveil direction and frequency of extensive structural rearrangements in wood white butterflies (Leptidea spp.).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative cytogenetics of two species ofComparative cytogenetics · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Centromeric enrichment of LINE-1 retrotransposons and its significance for the chromosome evolution of Phyllostomid bats.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Cibele G Sotero-CaioDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA. cibele.caio@gmail.com.
Marianne VollethDepartment of Human Genetics, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. marianne.volleth@med.ovgu.de.
Federico G HoffmannDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, MS, USA. federico.g.hoffmann@gmail.com.
LuAnn ScottDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA. lscott@uidaho.edu.
Holly A WichmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA. hwichman@uidaho.edu.
Fengtang YangThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK. fy1@sanger.ac.uk.
Robert J BakerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA. robert.baker@ttu.edu.
Texas Tech University · USUniversity of Idaho · USMississippi State University · USOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103476Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefining factors that contributed to the fixation of a high number of underdominant chromosomal rearrangements is a complex task because not only molecular mechanisms must be considered, but also the uniqueness of natural history attributes of each taxon. Ideally, detailed investigation of the chromosome architecture of an organism and related groups, placed within a phylogenetic context, is required. We used multiple approaches to investigate the dynamics of chromosomal evolution in lineages of bats with considerable karyotypic variation, focusing on the different facets contributing to fixation of the exceptional chromosomal changes in Tonatia saurophila. Integration of empirical data with proposed models of chromosome evolution was performed to understand the probable conditions for Tonatia's karyotypic evolution.

resultsThe trajectory of reorganization of chromosome blocks since the common ancestor of Glossophaginae and Phyllostominae subfamilies suggests that multiple tandem fusions, as well as disruption and fusions of conserved phyllostomid chromosomes were major drivers of karyotypic reshuffling in Tonatia. Considerable variation in the rates of chromosomal evolution between phyllostomid lineages was observed. Thirty-nine unique fusions and fission events reached fixation in Tonatia over a short period of time, followed by ~12 million years of chromosomal stasis. Physical mapping of repetitive DNA revealed an unusual accumulation of LINE-1 sequences on centromeric regions, probably associated with the chromosomal dynamics of this genus.

conclusionsMultiple rearrangements have reached fixation in a wave-like fashion in phyllostomid bats. Different biological features of Tonatia support distinct models of rearrangement fixation, and it is unlikely that the fixations were a result of solely stochastic processes in small ancient populations. Increased recombination rates were probably facilitated by expansion of repetitive DNA, reinforced by aspects of taxon reproduction and ecology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomes, MammalianAnimalsChiropteraIn Situ HybridizationKaryotypeModels, GeneticPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID26444412
PMCPMC4594642
OpenAlexW2159073961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.