Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26444155›Full record

ReviewSoft matter2016

Collective dynamics of processive cytoskeletal motors.

R Tyler McLaughlin, Michael R Diehl, Anatoly B Kolomeisky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Soft matter, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. FFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Understanding cytoskeletal avalanches using mechanical stability analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R Tyler McLaughlinRice University, Systems, Synthetic, and Physical Biology, Houston, TX 77005, USA and Rice University, Department of Bioengineering, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Michael R DiehlRice University, Systems, Synthetic, and Physical Biology, Houston, TX 77005, USA and Rice University, Department of Bioengineering, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Anatoly B KolomeiskyRice University, Systems, Synthetic, and Physical Biology, Houston, TX 77005, USA and Rice University, Department of Chemistry, Houston, TX 77005, USA. tolya@rice.edu.

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Governing Cooperating MotorsR01GM094489 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM094489-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major cellular processes are supported by various biomolecular motors that usually operate together as teams. We present an overview of the collective dynamics of processive cytokeletal motor proteins based on recent experimental and theoretical investigations. Experimental studies show that multiple motors function with different degrees of cooperativity, ranging from negative to positive. This effect depends on the mechanical properties of individual motors, the geometry of their connections, and the surrounding cellular environment. Theoretical models based on stochastic approaches underline the importance of intermolecular interactions, the properties of single motors, and couplings with cellular medium in predicting the collective dynamics. We discuss several features that specify the cooperativity in motor proteins. Based on this approach a general picture of collective dynamics of motor proteins is formulated, and the future directions and challenges are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytoskeletonHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Motor ProteinsMolecular Motor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26444155
PMCPMC4684438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.