Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26444005›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2015

Functional characterization of biodegradable nanoparticles as antigen delivery system.

A Petrizzo, C Conte, M Tagliamonte, M Napolitano, K Bifulco, V Carriero, A De Stradis, M L Tornesello, F M Buonaguro, F Quaglia and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Peptide-based vaccine for cancer therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A PetrizzoLaboratoy Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology, Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy.
C ConteDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131, Naples, Italy.
M TagliamonteLaboratoy Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology, Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy.
M NapolitanoLaboratory of Clinical Immunology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy.
K BifulcoLaboratory of Tumor Progression, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy.
V CarrieroLaboratory of Tumor Progression, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy.
A De StradisNational Research Council Institutional Sustainable Plant Protection, Bari, Italy.
M L TorneselloLaboratoy Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology, Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy.
F M BuonaguroLaboratoy Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology, Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy.
F QuagliaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131, Naples, Italy.
L BuonaguroLaboratoy Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology, Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola 142, 80131, Naples, Italy. l.buonaguro@istitutotumori.na.it.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeptide based vaccines may suffer from limited stability and inefficient delivery to professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells (DCs). In order to overcome such limitations, several types of biodegradable nanoparticles (NPs) have been developed as carrier system for antigens. The present study describes for the first time the extensive biological characterization of cationic NPs made of poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and polyethylenimine (PLGA/PEI) as delivery system for protein/peptide antigens, with potential in therapeutic cancer vaccine development.

resultsFlow cytometry as well as confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed that PLGA/PEI NPs are more readily taken up than PLGA NPs by both human CD14(+) monocytes and mouse Hepa 1-6 hepatoma cell line. No signs of toxicity were observed in either cellular setting. Sequential image acquisition by TEM showed an intracellular apical localization for PLGA NPs and a perinuclear localization for PLGA/PEI NPs. Both NPs showed a clathrin-dependent as well as a caveolin-dependent internalization pathway and, once in the cells, they formed multivesicular endosomes (MVE). Finally, an ex vivo priming experiment showed that PLGA/PEI NPs are comparable to PLGA NPs in delivering a non-self antigen (i.e., ovalbumin - OVA) to immature dendritic cells (imDCs), which matured and induced autologous naïve CD4(+) T cells to differentiate to memory (i.e., central memory and effector memory) cells. Such a differentiation was associated with a Th1 phenotype suggesting a downstream activation and amplification of a CD8(+) T cell cytotoxic response. The same OVA antigen in a soluble form was unable to induce maturation of DCs, indicating that both NP formulations provided an intrinsic adjuvanting effect combined to efficient antigen delivery.

conclusionsOur study represents the first report on side-by-side comparison of PLGA and PLGA/PEI NPs as strategy for protein antigen delivery. PLGA/PEI NPs are superior for cellular uptake and antigen delivery as compared to PLGA NPs. Such an evidence suggests their great potential value for vaccine development, including therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigensCancer VaccinesCaveolin 1CD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorClathrinDendritic CellsHumansImmunologic MemoryLactic AcidMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalMultivesicular BodiesNanoparticlesAntigensCancer VaccinesCaveolin 1ClathrinLactic AcidOvalbuminPolyethyleneiminePolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID26444005
PMCPMC4596393
OpenAlexW1859997696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.