Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26443842›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2015

Correlation of In Vivo Versus In Vitro Benchmark Doses (BMDs) Derived From Micronucleus Test Data: A Proof of Concept Study.

Lya G Soeteman-Hernández, Mick D Fellows, George E Johnson, Wout Slob

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as food additive.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lya G Soeteman-Hernández*National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands;
Mick D FellowsAstraZeneca, R&D Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TF, United Kingdom; and mick.fellows@astrazeneca.com.
George E JohnsonInstitute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, SA2 8PP Wales, United Kingdom.
Wout Slob*National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we explored the applicability of using in vitro micronucleus (MN) data from human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells to derive in vivo genotoxicity potency information. Nineteen chemicals covering a broad spectrum of genotoxic modes of action were tested in an in vitro MN test using TK6 cells using the same study protocol. Several of these chemicals were considered to need metabolic activation, and these were administered in the presence of S9. The Benchmark dose (BMD) approach was applied using the dose-response modeling program PROAST to estimate the genotoxic potency from the in vitro data. The resulting in vitro BMDs were compared with previously derived BMDs from in vivo MN and carcinogenicity studies. A proportional correlation was observed between the BMDs from the in vitro MN and the BMDs from the in vivo MN assays. Further, a clear correlation was found between the BMDs from in vitro MN and the associated BMDs for malignant tumors. Although these results are based on only 19 compounds, they show that genotoxicity potencies estimated from in vitro tests may result in useful information regarding in vivo genotoxic potency, as well as expected cancer potency. Extension of the number of compounds and further investigation of metabolic activation (S9) and of other toxicokinetic factors would be needed to validate our initial conclusions. However, this initial work suggests that this approach could be used for in vitro to in vivo extrapolations which would support the reduction of animals used in research (3Rs: replacement, reduction, and refinement).

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesBenchmarkingCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLymphocytesMicronuclei, Chromosome-DefectiveMicronucleus TestsReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessmentgenotoxic potencyin vitro micronucleusTK6 cells, benchmark dose approach

Identifiers

PMID26443842
PMCPMC4659532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.