Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26443662›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention.

Rachelle Bernacki, Mathilde Hutchings, Judith Vick, Grant Smith, Joanna Paladino, Stuart Lipsitz, Atul A Gawande, Susan D Block

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 190 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01786811 nacompletednot on this map

Serious Illness Communication Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2012 to 2016Enrolled994ConditionsEnd of Life Care, CancerArmsTraining
NCT03901547 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

An Education and Behavioral, Single-center, Observational Cohort Study Evaluating the Effect of Emotion Regulation and Burnout on Medical Trainees' Learning and Documentation of Serious Illness Communication

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2019 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsCommunicationArmsCommunication Skills Training, Profile feedback, Maslach burnout inventory, Emotion Regulation Skills Question (ERSQ), Semi-structured interview
NCT07753668 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Improving Care for Cancer Patients by Facilitating Communication With Clinicians Through a Serious Illness Communication Program Using an Assistant Based on Artificial Intelligence.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCudeca Hospice FoundationRan2026 to 2028Enrolled190ConditionsCancer Care ProvidersArmsIntervention Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Timing of prognostic discussions in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachelle BernackiHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Ariadne Labs at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School Center for Palliative Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mathilde HutchingsDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Ariadne Labs at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Judith VickJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Grant SmithUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Joanna PaladinoDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Ariadne Labs at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Stuart LipsitzAriadne Labs at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Atul A GawandeHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Ariadne Labs at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan D BlockHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Ariadne Labs at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School Center for Palliative Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

PHS HHS K01HP2046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnsuring that patients receive care that is consistent with their goals and values is a critical component of high-quality care. This article describes the protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent, structured communication intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with advanced, incurable cancer and life expectancy of <12 months will participate together with their surrogate. Clinicians are enrolled and randomised either to usual care or the intervention. The Serious Illness Care Program is a multicomponent, structured communication intervention designed to identify patients, train clinicians to use a structured guide for advanced care planning discussion with patients, 'trigger' clinicians to have conversations, prepare patients and families for the conversation, and document outcomes of the discussion in a structured format in the electronic medical record. Clinician satisfaction with the intervention, confidence and attitudes will be assessed before and after the intervention. Self-report data will be collected from patients and surrogates approximately every 2 months up to 2 years or until the patient's death; patient medical records will be examined at the close of the study. Analyses will examine the impact of the intervention on the patient receipt of goal-concordant care, and peacefulness at the end of life. Secondary outcomes include patient anxiety, depression, quality of life, therapeutic alliance, quality of communication, and quality of dying and death. Key process measures include frequency, timing and quality of documented conversations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Institutional Review Board. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Protocol identifier NCT01786811; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance Care PlanningCluster AnalysisHumansNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID26443662
PMCPMC4606432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.