Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26443533›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2016

Using political science to progress public health nutrition: a systematic review.

Katherine Cullerton, Timothy Donnet, Amanda Lee, Danielle Gallegos

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modelling the Health Policy Process: One Size Fits All or Horses for Courses?International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine Cullerton1School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,Queensland University of Technology,Victoria Park Road,Kelvin Grove,QLD 4059,Australia.
Timothy Donnet2School of Management,Queensland University of Technology,Brisbane,Queensland,Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2971-6814
Amanda Lee3School of Public Health and Social Work,Queensland University of Technology,Kelvin Grove,Queensland,Australia.
Danielle Gallegos1School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,Queensland University of Technology,Victoria Park Road,Kelvin Grove,QLD 4059,Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePoor dietary intake is the most important behavioural risk factor affecting health globally. Despite this, there has been little investment in public health nutrition policy actions. Policy process theories from the field of political science can aid understanding why policy decisions have occurred and identify how to influence ongoing or future initiatives. The present review aims to examine public health nutrition policy literature and identify whether a policy process theory has been used to analyse the process.

designElectronic databases were searched systematically for studies examining policy making in public health nutrition in high-income, democratic countries.

settingInternational, national, state and local government jurisdictions within high-income, democratic countries. SUBJECTS: Individuals and organisations involved in the nutrition policy-making process.

resultsSixty-three studies met the eligibility criteria, most were conducted in the USA and a majority focused on obesity. The analysis demonstrates an accelerating trend in the number of nutrition policy papers published annually and an increase in the diversity of nutrition topics examined. The use of policy process theory was observed from 2003; however, it was utilised by only 14 % of the reviewed papers.

conclusionsThere is limited research into the nutrition policy process in high-income countries. While there has been a small increase in the use of policy process theory from 2003, an opportunity to expand its use is evident. We suggest that nutrition policy making would benefit from a pragmatic approach that ensures those trying to influence or understand the policy-making process are equipped with basic knowledge around these theories.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyPolicy MakingPublic HealthHumansNutritional StatusPoliticsAdvocacyNutrition policyPolitical theory

Identifiers

PMID26443533
PMCPMC10271115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.