Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26443529›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

Is Abdominal Fat Distribution Measured by Axial CT Imaging an Indicator of Complications and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis?

T C Hall, J S Stephenson, M J Jones, W S Ngu, M A Horsfield, A Rajesh, A R Dennison, G Garcea

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Association of Computed Tomography-Assessed Body Composition with Mortality in Patients with Necrotizing Pancreatitis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T C HallDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK. tch2@doctors.org.uk.
J S StephensonDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
M J JonesDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
W S NguDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
M A HorsfieldDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
A RajeshDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
A R DennisonDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
G GarceaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is an important risk-stratifying co-morbidity for many pathological conditions. Controversy exists about its influence in outcomes after acute pancreatitis (AP). This study assessed abdominal fat distribution (subcutaneous, retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal) measured using computer tomography (CT) images and related it to outcomes in patients with AP.

methodsThe case notes of patients admitted with AP were identified from computerised records from 2008 to the 2013. Image analysis software was used to assess the individual abdominal fat distributions from CT images.

resultsA total of 79 patients were included. There was no relationship between fat distribution and either severity of, or mortality from, AP. Fat distribution was not found to be an independent risk factor on multivariate analysis. There was, however, a positive correlation between retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal fat with APACHE II scores, Ranson and Glasgow score and Multiple Organ Dysfunction score (MODS) on various days following admission (r = 0.421, p = 0.0008; r = 0.469, p < 0.0001; r = 0.398, p = 0.007; r = 0.336, p = 0.011, respectively). On multiple logistical regression analysis, the only variables associated with mortality were Balthazar Severity Index, MODS and EWS with a p value of <0.0001, 0.0019 and 0.0481, respectively.

conclusionsObese patients have worse predicted outcomes as measured by the EWS, MODS and Ranson scores. Abdominal fat distribution, however, was not shown to be directly related to AP severity or mortality. The addition of fat parameters may be of use in prognostic CT severity index models, but from this data, it does not appear to be an independent risk factor of adverse outcome.

Indexed as

AdiposityAbdominal FatAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisObesityPancreatitisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAcute pancreatitisCTObesity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.