Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442928›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015

Trends in colorectal cancer mortality in Europe: retrospective analysis of the WHO mortality database.

Driss Ait Ouakrim, Cécile Pizot, Magali Boniol, Matteo Malvezzi, Mathieu Boniol, Eva Negri, Maria Bota, Mark A Jenkins, Harry Bleiberg, Philippe Autier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of exercise training on cancer-related fatigue in colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Driss Ait OuakrimCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Cécile PizotDepartment of Biostatistics, International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France.
Magali BoniolDepartment of Biostatistics, International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France.
Matteo MalvezziDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Universitá degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Mathieu BoniolDepartment of Biostatistics, International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France University of Strathclyde Institute for Global Public Health at iPRI, Lyon, France.
Eva NegriDepartment of Epidemiology, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri), Milan, Italy.
Maria BotaDepartment of Biostatistics, International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France University of Strathclyde Institute for Global Public Health at iPRI, Lyon, France.
Mark A JenkinsCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Harry BleibergJules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe AutierUniversity of Strathclyde Institute for Global Public Health at iPRI, Lyon, France Department of Population Research, International Prevention Research Institute, 69006 Lyon Cedex 08, France philippe.autier@i-pri.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine changes in colorectal cancer mortality in 34 European countries between 1970 and 2011.

designRetrospective trend analysis. DATA SOURCE: World Health Organization mortality database. POPULATION: Deaths from colorectal cancer between 1970 and 2011. Profound changes in screening and treatment efficiency took place after 1988; therefore, particular attention was paid to the evolution of colorectal cancer mortality in the subsequent period. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Time trends in rates of colorectal cancer mortality, using joinpoint regression analysis. Rates were age adjusted using the standard European population.

resultsFrom 1989 to 2011, colorectal cancer mortality increased by a median of 6.0% for men and decreased by a median of 14.7% for women in the 34 European countries. Reductions in colorectal cancer mortality of more than 25% in men and 30% in women occurred in Austria, Switzerland, Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Luxembourg, and Ireland. By contrast, mortality rates fell by less than 17% in the Netherlands and Sweden for both sexes. Over the same period, smaller or no declines occurred in most central European countries. Substantial mortality increases occurred in Croatia, the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia, and Romania for both sexes and in most eastern European countries for men. In countries with decreasing mortality, reductions were more important for women of all ages and men younger than 65 years. In the 27 European Union member states, colorectal cancer mortality fell by 13.0% in men and 27.0% in women, compared with corresponding reductions of 39.8% and 38.8% in the United States.

conclusionOver the past 40 years, there has been considerable disparity in the level of colorectal cancer mortality between European countries, as well as between men and women and age categories. Countries with the largest reductions in colorectal cancer mortality are characterised by better accessibility to screening services, especially endoscopic screening, and specialised care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityRetrospective StudiesWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID26442928
PMCPMC4595561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.