Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442818›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2016

Assessing the Pathogenicity of Insertion and Deletion Variants with the Variant Effect Scoring Tool (VEST-Indel).

Christopher Douville, David L Masica, Peter D Stenson, David N Cooper, Derek M Gygax, Rick Kim, Michael Ryan, Rachel Karchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Performance ofHuman mutation · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Structural and energetic analysis of stabilizing indel mutations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Synergic activity of FGFR2 and MEK inhibitors in the treatment of FGFR2-amplified cancers of unknown primary.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher DouvilleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
David L MasicaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter D StensonInstitute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
David N CooperInstitute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Derek M GygaxIn Silico Solutions, Fairfax, Virginia.
Rick KimIn Silico Solutions, Fairfax, Virginia.
Michael RyanIn Silico Solutions, Fairfax, Virginia.
Rachel KarchinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Informatics Tools for High-throughput Analysis of Cancer MutationsU24CA204817 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KARCHIN, RACHEL · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Informatics Tools for High-throughput Analysis of Cancer MutationsU01CA180956 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KARCHIN, RACHEL · 2013 to 2015
$923k
NCI NIH HHS NCI U01CA180956NCI NIH HHS U01 CA180956NCI NIH HHS U24 CA204817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion/deletion variants (indels) alter protein sequence and length, yet are highly prevalent in healthy populations, presenting a challenge to bioinformatics classifiers. Commonly used features--DNA and protein sequence conservation, indel length, and occurrence in repeat regions--are useful for inference of protein damage. However, these features can cause false positives when predicting the impact of indels on disease. Existing methods for indel classification suffer from low specificities, severely limiting clinical utility. Here, we further develop our variant effect scoring tool (VEST) to include the classification of in-frame and frameshift indels (VEST-indel) as pathogenic or benign. We apply 24 features, including a new "PubMed" feature, to estimate a gene's importance in human disease. When compared with four existing indel classifiers, our method achieves a drastically reduced false-positive rate, improving specificity by as much as 90%. This approach of estimating gene importance might be generally applicable to missense and other bioinformatics pathogenicity predictors, which often fail to achieve high specificity. Finally, we tested all possible meta-predictors that can be obtained from combining the four different indel classifiers using Boolean conjunctions and disjunctions, and derived a meta-predictor with improved performance over any individual method.

Indexed as

INDEL MutationSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicHumansModels, GeneticMutation, MissenseReproducibility of ResultsWeb Browserbioinformatics pathogenicity predictorindelin-frame frameshiftinsertion deletion variantmeta-predictor

Identifiers

PMID26442818
PMCPMC5057310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.