Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442792›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2016

Genome distribution of differential homoeologue contributions to leaf gene expression in bread wheat.

Andrea L Harper, Martin Trick, Zhesi He, Leah Clissold, Alison Fellgett, Simon Griffiths, Ian Bancroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ancient wheat DNA: How and what for?Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. AFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  10. Competition of Parental Genomes in Plant Hybrids.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea L HarperDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Martin TrickJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Zhesi HeDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Leah ClissoldJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Alison FellgettDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Simon GriffithsJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Ian BancroftDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H004351/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002124/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L027844/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a combination of de novo transcriptome assembly, a newly developed 9495-marker transcriptome SNP genetic linkage map and comparative genomics approaches, we developed an ordered set of nonredundant transcripts for each of the subgenomes of hexaploid wheat: A (47 160 unigenes), B (59 663 unigenes) and D (40 588 unigenes). We used these as reference sequences against which to map Illumina mRNA-Seq reads derived from young leaf tissue. Transcript abundance was quantified for each unigene. Using a three-way reciprocal BLAST approach, 15 527 triplet sets of homoeologues (one from each genome) were identified. Differential expression (P < 0.05) was identified for 5248 unigenes, with 2906 represented at greater abundance than their two homoeologues and 2342 represented at lower abundance than their two homoeologues. Analysis of gene ontology terms revealed no biases between homoeologues. There was no evidence of genomewide dominance effects, rather the more highly transcribed individual genes were distributed throughout all three genomes. Transcriptome display tile plot, a visualization approach based on CMYK colour space, was developed and used to assess the genome for regions of skewed homoeologue transcript abundance. Extensive striation was revealed, indicative of many small regions of genome dominance (transcripts of homoeologues from one genome more abundant than the others) and many larger regions of genome repression (transcripts of homoeologues from one genome less abundant than the others).

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGenomicsTranscriptomeGene OntologyGenome, PlantPlant LeavesSequence HomologyTriticumbread wheatdifferential expressiongenome dominance

Identifiers

PMID26442792
PMCPMC4973816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.