Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442529›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

NCLscan: accurate identification of non-co-linear transcripts (fusion, trans-splicing and circular RNA) with a good balance between sensitivity and precision.

Trees-Juen Chuang, Chan-Shuo Wu, Chia-Ying Chen, Li-Yuan Hung, Tai-Wei Chiang, Min-Yu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. State-of-the-Art Circular RNA Analytics Using the Circtools Software Suite.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trees-Juen ChuangDivision of Physical and Computational Genomics, Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan trees@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Chan-Shuo WuDivision of Physical and Computational Genomics, Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Chia-Ying ChenDivision of Physical and Computational Genomics, Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Li-Yuan HungDivision of Physical and Computational Genomics, Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Tai-Wei ChiangDivision of Physical and Computational Genomics, Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Min-Yu YangDivision of Physical and Computational Genomics, Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of RNA-seq data often detects numerous 'non-co-linear' (NCL) transcripts, which comprised sequence segments that are topologically inconsistent with their corresponding DNA sequences in the reference genome. However, detection of NCL transcripts involves two major challenges: removal of false positives arising from alignment artifacts and discrimination between different types of NCL transcripts (trans-spliced, circular or fusion transcripts). Here, we developed a new NCL-transcript-detecting method ('NCLscan'), which utilized a stepwise alignment strategy to almost completely eliminate false calls (>98% precision) without sacrificing true positives, enabling NCLscan outperform 18 other publicly-available tools (including fusion- and circular-RNA-detecting tools) in terms of sensitivity and precision, regardless of the generation strategy of simulated dataset, type of intragenic or intergenic NCL event, read depth of coverage, read length or expression level of NCL transcript. With the high accuracy, NCLscan was applied to distinguishing between trans-spliced, circular and fusion transcripts on the basis of poly(A)- and nonpoly(A)-selected RNA-seq data. We showed that circular RNAs were expressed more ubiquitously, more abundantly and less cell type-specifically than trans-spliced and fusion transcripts. Our study thus describes a robust pipeline for the discovery of NCL transcripts, and sheds light on the fundamental biology of these non-canonical RNA events in human transcriptome.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingLimit of DetectionReproducibility of ResultsRNARNA, CircularRNA, MessengerRNARNA, CircularRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26442529
PMCPMC4756807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.