Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442512›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2016

Primary stability of rotator cuff repair: can more suture materials yield more strength?

Mehmet Gülecyüz, Hannes Bortolotti, Matthias Pietschmann, Andreas Ficklscherer, Thomas Niethammer, Björn Roßbach, Peter Müller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Subacromial bone erosion due to suture-knots in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A report of two cases.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehmet GülecyüzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Center of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany. mehmet.guelecyuez@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Hannes BortolottiDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, A.Ö. BKH Kufstein, Kufstein, Austria.
Matthias PietschmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Center of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas FicklschererDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Center of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas NiethammerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Center of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Björn RoßbachDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Center of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter MüllerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Center of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt remains unclear if the increased biomechanical stability of the double-row repair is solely a result of the technique itself or due to the greater number of utilized materials. This study analyses the various rotator cuff (RC) repair interfaces and the influence of doubling the number of suture knots, stitch techniques and suture anchors on the primary stability of the RC reconstruction. MATERIALS AND

methodsEstablished cyclic testing protocols were used to test the primary stability of the knot interface with a Duncan loop and Roeder knot, the tendon-to-suture interface with a single-stitch and Mason-Allen-stitch and the anchor-to-bone interface with OPUS Magnum 2® and BioCorkscrew® anchors. After doubling the materials, the interfaces were tested again and compared to the yielded solitary values. The maximum failure loads (Fmax), clinical failure (CF), system displacement (SD) and modes of failure were recorded.

resultsDoubling the amount of knots, stitches and suture anchors improved almost all interface parameters. For example, Fmax, CF and SD of the Roeder knot could be significantly improved from 142.5 N to 256.7 N, from 82.5 N to 155.0 N and from 0.45 mm to 0.20 mm, respectively. The Mason-Allen stitch's Fmax improved from 196.4 N to 324.9 N, and CF from 94.25 N to 139.8 N, with almost identical SD of 0.81 mm and 0.84 mm. Bio-Corkscrew® Fmax improved from 232.5 N to 317.5 N, CF from 182.5 N to 210 N, and SD from 0.85 mm to 0.64 mm.

conclusionDoubling the number of knots, stitches and suture anchors increases the primary stability of the various RC repair interfaces and may result in RC rerupture rate reduction. Furthermore, this study suggests that a suture anchor loaded with two or three sutures may yield the same primary stability as two or three suture anchors loaded with a single suture. This in vitro biomechanical study focuses solely on the rotator cuff interfaces at time zero; the biological healing process was therefore not analysed and requires further investigation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improved primary stability by increased number of suture materials may reduce rate of RC rerupture.

Indexed as

Suture AnchorsSuture TechniquesArthroplastyBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansIn Vitro TechniquesRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesSuturesBiomechanicsDouble rowPrimary stabilityRotator cuffSingle rowSuture anchorsSutures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.