ArticleWorm2014
C. elegans sirtuin SIR-2.4 and its mammalian homolog SIRT6 in stress response.
Article in Worm, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Chromatin and epigenetics in aging biology.Genetics · 2025Review
- The C. elegans Myc-family of transcription factors coordinate a dynamic adaptive response to dietary restriction.GeroScience · 2024Article
- HSF-1: Guardian of the Proteome Through Integration of Longevity Signals to the Proteostatic Network.Frontiers in aging · 2022Review
- Sirtuins and Autophagy in Age-Associated Neurodegenerative Diseases: Lessons from theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Sirtuins and SIRT6 in Carcinogenesis and in Diet.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress is a significant life event. The immediate response to stress is critical for survival. In organisms ranging from the unicellular Saccharomyces cerevisiae to protozoa (Trypanosoma brucei) and metazoan (such as Caenorhabditis elegans, Homo sapiens) stress response leads to the formation of cytoplasmic RNA-protein complexes referred to as stress granules (SGs). SGs regulate cell survival during stress by the sequestration of the signaling molecules implicated in apoptosis. They are a transient place of messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs) remodeling for storage, degradation, or reinitiation of translation during stress and recovery from stress. Recently, we have identified chromatin factor, the sirtuin C. elegans SIR-2.4 variant and its mammalian homolog SIRT6 as a regulator of SGs formation. SIRT6 is highly conserved NAD(+)-dependent lysine deacetylase and ADP-ribosyltransferase impacting longevity, metabolism, and cancer. We observed that the cellular formation of SGs by SIRT6 or SIR-2.4 was linked with the cell viability or C. elegans survival and was dependent on SIRT6 enzymatic activity. Here, we discuss how SIR-2.4/SIRT6 influences SGs formation and stress response. We suggest possible mechanisms for such an unanticipated function of a chromatin regulatory factor SIRT6 in assembly of stress granules and cellular stress resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.