Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442101›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2015

Molecular footprinting of skeletal tissues in the catshark Scyliorhinus canicula and the clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis identifies conserved and derived features of vertebrate calcification.

Sébastien Enault, David N Muñoz, Willian T A F Silva, Véronique Borday-Birraux, Morgane Bonade, Silvan Oulion, Stéphanie Ventéo, Sylvain Marcellini, Mélanie Debiais-Thibaud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Divergent Expression ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mineralization of theFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Sébastien EnaultInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, UMR5554, Université Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IRD, EPHE Montpellier, France.
David N MuñozLaboratory of Development and Evolution, Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad de Concepción Concepción, Chile.
Willian T A F SilvaInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, UMR5554, Université Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IRD, EPHE Montpellier, France.
Véronique Borday-BirrauxLaboratoire EGCE UMR Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 9191, IRD247, Université Paris Sud Gif-sur-Yvette, France ; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité Paris, France.
Morgane BonadeLaboratoire EGCE UMR Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 9191, IRD247, Université Paris Sud Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Silvan OulionInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, UMR5554, Université Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IRD, EPHE Montpellier, France.
Stéphanie VentéoInstitute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1051 Montpellier, France.
Sylvain MarcelliniLaboratory of Development and Evolution, Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad de Concepción Concepción, Chile.
Mélanie Debiais-ThibaudInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, UMR5554, Université Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IRD, EPHE Montpellier, France.
École Pratique des Hautes Études · FRUniversity of Concepción · CLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRInstitute for Neurosciences of Montpellier · FRUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the evolutionary emergence and subsequent diversification of the vertebrate skeleton requires a comprehensive view of the diverse skeletal cell types found in distinct developmental contexts, tissues, and species. To date, our knowledge of the molecular nature of the shark calcified extracellular matrix, and its relationships with osteichthyan skeletal tissues, remain scarce. Here, based on specific combinations of expression patterns of the Col1a1, Col1a2, and Col2a1 fibrillar collagen genes, we compare the molecular footprint of endoskeletal elements from the chondrichthyan Scyliorhinus canicula and the tetrapod Xenopus tropicalis. We find that, depending on the anatomical location, Scyliorhinus skeletal calcification is associated to cell types expressing different subsets of fibrillar collagen genes, such as high levels of Col1a1 and Col1a2 in the neural arches, high levels of Col2a1 in the tesserae, or associated to a drastic Col2a1 downregulation in the centrum. We detect low Col2a1 levels in Xenopus osteoblasts, thereby revealing that the osteoblastic expression of this gene was significantly reduced in the tetrapod lineage. Finally, we uncover a striking parallel, from a molecular and histological perspective, between the vertebral cartilage calcification of both species and discuss the evolutionary origin of endochondral ossification.

Indexed as

bonecartilagefibrillar collagensScyliorhinus caniculavertebrate skeletogenesisXenopus tropicalis

Identifiers

PMID26442101
PMCPMC4584932
OpenAlexW1770789956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.