Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442023›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015

Signaling in the phytomicrobiome: breadth and potential.

Donald L Smith, Sowmyalakshmi Subramanian, John R Lamont, Margaret Bywater-Ekegärd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Consortium ofTropical life sciences research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Interactions BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Oleuropein Transcriptionally PrimesFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donald L SmithPlant Science Department, McGill University/Macdonald Campus, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC Canada.
Sowmyalakshmi SubramanianPlant Science Department, McGill University/Macdonald Campus, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC Canada.
John R LamontPlant Science Department, McGill University/Macdonald Campus, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC Canada.
Margaret Bywater-EkegärdInocucor Technologies Inc., Montréal, QC Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher plants have evolved intimate, complex, subtle, and relatively constant relationships with a suite of microbes, the phytomicrobiome. Over the last few decades we have learned that plants and microbes can use molecular signals to communicate. This is well-established for the legume-rhizobia nitrogen-fixing symbiosis, and reasonably elucidated for mycorrhizal associations. Bacteria within the phytomircobiome communicate among themselves through quorum sensing and other mechanisms. Plants also detect materials produced by potential pathogens and activate pathogen-response systems. This intercommunication dictates aspects of plant development, architecture, and productivity. Understanding this signaling via biochemical, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomic studies has added valuable knowledge regarding development of effective, low-cost, eco-friendly crop inputs that reduce fossil fuel intense inputs. This knowledge underpins phytomicrobiome engineering: manipulating the beneficial consortia that manufacture signals/products that improve the ability of the plant-phytomicrobiome community to deal with various soil and climatic conditions, leading to enhanced overall crop plant productivity.

Indexed as

cropholobiontmolecular signalsphytomicrobiomeplant growth promoting rhizobacteria

Identifiers

PMID26442023
PMCPMC4563166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.