Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26442014›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Natural variation in cross-talk between glucosinolates and onset of flowering in Arabidopsis.

Lea M Jensen, Henriette S K Jepsen, Barbara A Halkier, Daniel J Kliebenstein, Meike Burow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impacts of Sulfur on Glucosinolate Metabolism: FromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New vegetable varieties ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Herbivore feeding preference corroborates optimal defense theory for specialized metabolites within plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lea M JensenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, DNRF Center DynaMo, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark ; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Henriette S K JepsenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, DNRF Center DynaMo, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark ; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Barbara A HalkierDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, DNRF Center DynaMo, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark ; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Daniel J KliebensteinDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, DNRF Center DynaMo, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark ; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Meike BurowDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, DNRF Center DynaMo, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark ; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturally variable regulatory networks control different biological processes including reproduction and defense. This variation within regulatory networks enables plants to optimize defense and reproduction in different environments. In this study we investigate the ability of two enzyme-encoding genes in the glucosinolate pathway, AOP2 and AOP3, to affect glucosinolate accumulation and flowering time. We have introduced the two highly similar enzymes into two different AOP (null) accessions, Col-0 and Cph-0, and found that the genes differ in their ability to affect glucosinolate levels and flowering time across the accessions. This indicated that the different glucosinolates produced by AOP2 and AOP3 serve specific regulatory roles in controlling these phenotypes. While the changes in glucosinolate levels were similar in both accessions, the effect on flowering time was dependent on the genetic background pointing to natural variation in cross-talk between defense chemistry and onset of flowering. This variation likely reflects an adaptation to survival in different environments.

Indexed as

AOP2AOP3cross-talkflowering timeglucosinolatesregulation

Identifiers

PMID26442014
PMCPMC4561820
OpenAlexW1838993472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.