Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26441905›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Efficient recombinant production of prodigiosin in Pseudomonas putida.

Andreas Domröse, Andreas S Klein, Jennifer Hage-Hülsmann, Stephan Thies, Vera Svensson, Thomas Classen, Jörg Pietruszka, Karl-Erich Jaeger, Thomas Drepper, Anita Loeschcke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-level prodigiosin production inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reliable Genomic Integration Sites inACS synthetic biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cold adaptedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas DomröseInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Andreas S KleinInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Jennifer Hage-HülsmannInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Stephan ThiesInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Vera SvenssonInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Thomas ClassenInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-1): Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Jörg PietruszkaInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany ; Institute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-1): Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Karl-Erich JaegerInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany ; Institute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-1): Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Thomas DrepperInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Anita LoeschckeInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serratia marcescens and several other bacteria produce the red-colored pigment prodigiosin which possesses bioactivities as an antimicrobial, anticancer, and immunosuppressive agent. Therefore, there is a great interest to produce this natural compound. Efforts aiming at its biotechnological production have so far largely focused on the original producer and opportunistic human pathogen S. marcescens. Here, we demonstrate efficient prodigiosin production in the heterologous host Pseudomonas putida. Random chromosomal integration of the 21 kb prodigiosin biosynthesis gene cluster of S. marcescens in P. putida KT2440 was employed to construct constitutive prodigiosin production strains. Standard cultivation parameters were optimized such that titers of 94 mg/L culture were obtained upon growth of P. putida at 20°C using rich medium under high aeration conditions. Subsequently, a novel, fast and effective protocol for prodigiosin extraction and purification was established enabling the straightforward isolation of prodigiosin from P. putida growth medium. In summary, we describe here a highly efficient method for the heterologous biosynthetic production of prodigiosin which may serve as a basis to produce large amounts of this bioactive natural compound and may provide a platform for further in-depth studies of prodiginine biosynthesis.

Indexed as

extractionheterologous productionprodigiosinPseudomonas putidapurification

Identifiers

PMID26441905
PMCPMC4569968
OpenAlexW1897275769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.