ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015
Metagenomic analysis reveals that modern microbialites and polar microbial mats have similar taxonomic and functional potential.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of multiple metabolic pathways supports high rates of carbon precipitation in living microbialites.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The eukaryome of modern microbialites reveals distinct colonization across aquatic ecosystems.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of prokaryotic microbiomes in high-altitude active layer soils: insights from Ladakh and global analogues using In-Silico approaches.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Non-charismatic waterbodies and ecosystem disservices: Mine pit lakes are underrepresented in the literature.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Conserved bacterial genomes from two geographically isolated peritidal stromatolite formations shed light on potential functional guilds.Environmental microbiology reports · 2021Article
- A comprehensive survey of integron-associated genes present in metagenomes.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Biosignatures Associated with Freshwater Microbialites.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Unexpected Abundance and Diversity of Phototrophs in Mats from Morphologically Variable Microbialites in Great Salt Lake, Utah.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Functional Gene Expression in Shark Bay Hypersaline Microbial Mats: Adaptive Responses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Reconstruction of the Functional Ecosystem in the High Light, Low Temperature Union Glacier Region, Antarctica.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- A Preliminary Study of Biliary Microbiota in Patients with Bile Duct Stones or Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Article
- Disentangling the drivers of functional complexity at the metagenomic level in Shark Bay microbial mat microbiomes.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Multiple Strategies for Light-Harvesting, Photoprotection, and Carbon Flow in High Latitude Microbial Mats.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Daily rhythmicity in coastal microbial mats.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2018Article
- Viral Communities of Shark Bay Modern Stromatolites.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- The Complete Genome and Physiological Analysis of the Microbialite-DwellingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Understanding the Mechanisms Behind the Response to Environmental Perturbation in Microbial Mats: A Metagenomic-Network Based Approach.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- The Complete Genome and Physiological Analysis of the Eurythermal FirmicuteFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the subarctic climate of Clinton Creek, Yukon, Canada, lies an abandoned and flooded open-pit asbestos mine that harbors rapidly growing microbialites. To understand their formation we completed a metagenomic community profile of the microbialites and their surrounding sediments. Assembled metagenomic data revealed that bacteria within the phylum Proteobacteria numerically dominated this system, although the relative abundances of taxa within the phylum varied among environments. Bacteria belonging to Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were dominant in the microbialites and sediments, respectively. The microbialites were also home to many other groups associated with microbialite formation including filamentous cyanobacteria and dissimilatory sulfate-reducing Deltaproteobacteria, consistent with the idea of a shared global microbialite microbiome. Other members were present that are typically not associated with microbialites including Gemmatimonadetes and iron-oxidizing Betaproteobacteria, which participate in carbon metabolism and iron cycling. Compared to the sediments, the microbialite microbiome has significantly more genes associated with photosynthetic processes (e.g., photosystem II reaction centers, carotenoid, and chlorophyll biosynthesis) and carbon fixation (e.g., CO dehydrogenase). The Clinton Creek microbialite communities had strikingly similar functional potentials to non-lithifying microbial mats from the Canadian High Arctic and Antarctica, but are functionally distinct, from non-lithifying mats or biofilms from Yellowstone. Clinton Creek microbialites also share metabolic genes (R (2) < 0.750) with freshwater microbial mats from Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico, but are more similar to polar Arctic mats (R (2) > 0.900). These metagenomic profiles from an anthropogenic microbialite-forming ecosystem provide context to microbialite formation on a human-relevant timescale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.