ReviewFrontiers in physiology2015
Revisiting the mitogenetic effect of ultra-weak photon emission.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Are we trapped on Earth: space and accelerated ageing.NPJ microgravity · 2025Review
- Red and near-infrared light treatment can change the intensity of biophoton emissions in cell culture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Murburn Bioenergetics and "Origins-Sustenance-Termination-Evolution of Life": Emergence of Intelligence from a Network of Molecules, Unbound Ions, Radicals and Radiations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Resonant Oscillations of Ion-Stabilized Nanobubbles in Water as a Possible Source of Electromagnetic Radiation in the Gigahertz Range.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Codepoietic Generation of Meaningful Information in the Evolving Biosphere.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Women authors in the first 50 years of DGE-contributions and research topics.Development genes and evolution · 2024Review
- Open quantum systems theory of ultraweak ultraviolet photon emissions: Revisiting Gurwitsch's onion experiment as a prototype for quantum biology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Ultra-weak photon emission from DNA.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ultra weak photon emission-a brief review.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Energetic homeostasis achieved through biophoton energy and accompanying medication treatment resulted in sustained levels of Thyroiditis-Hashimoto's, iron, vitamin D & vitamin B12.Metabolism open · 2023Article
- Non-chemical signalling between mitochondria.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Crucial Development: Criticality Is Important to Cell-to-Cell Communication and Information Transfer in Living Systems.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Generation of Electromagnetic Field by Microtubules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Stochastic light concentration from 3D to 2D reveals ultraweak chemi- and bioluminescence.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Integrating Ultra-Weak Photon Emission Analysis in Mitochondrial Research.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Rejection of the biophoton hypothesis on the origin of photoreceptor dark noise.The Journal of general physiology · 2019Article
- Oxidative species-induced excitonic transport in tubulin aromatic networks: Potential implications for neurodegenerative disease.Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology · 2017Article
- Physical Non-Contact Communication between Microscopic Aquatic Species: Novel Experimental Evidences for an Interspecies Information Exchange.Journal of biophysics (Hindawi Publishing Corporation : Online) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper reviews the 90 years long controversial history of the so-called "mitogenetic radiation," the first case of non-chemical distant interactions, reported by Gurwitsch (1923). It was soon described as ultraweak UV, emitted by a number of biological systems, and stimulating mitosis in "competent" (in this sense) cells. In the following 20 years this phenomenon attracted enormous interest of the scientific community, and gave rise to more than 700 publications around the world. Yet, this wave of research vanished after several ostensibly disproving works in late 1930-s, and was not resumed later, regardless of quite serious grounds for that. The authors discuss separately two aspects of the problem: (1) do living organisms emit ultraweak radiation in the UV range (irrespective of whether it has any biological role), and (2) are there any real effects of this ultraweak photon emission (UPE) upon cell division and/or other biological functions? Analysis of the available data permits to conclude, that UV fraction of UPE should be regarded real, while its biological effects are difficult to reproduce. This causes a paradox. A number of presently known qualities of UPE were initially discovered (predicted?) by the "early workers" on the basis of biological effects. Yet the qualities they discovered were proved later (the UV component of UPE, the sources of UPE among biological systems, etc…), while the biological effect they used for UPE "detection" remains questionable. Importance of this area for basic biology and medicine, and potential usefulness of UPE as a non-invasive research method, invite scientists to attack this problem again, applying powerful research facilities of modern science. Yet, because of complexity and uncertainty of the problem, further progress in this area demands comprehensive examination of both positive and negative works, with particular attention to their methodical details.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.