ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2015
Genetically-encoded tools for cAMP probing and modulation in living systems.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The interactions between melatonin and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in vascular attenuation in diabetic and non-diabetic conditions.Acta diabetologica · 2025Review
- Adenylyl cyclase isoforms 5 and 6 in the cardiovascular system: complex regulation and divergent roles.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Large scale, single-cell FRET-based glucose uptake measurements within heterogeneous populations.iScience · 2022Article
- iGIST-A Kinetic Bioassay for Pertussis Toxin Based on Its Effect on Inhibitory GPCR Signaling.ACS sensors · 2020Article
- Cyclic AMP: A Polyhedral Signalling Molecule in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Optogenetic Techniques for Manipulating and Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Review
- Fluorescence Observation of Single-Cell cAMP Signaling by G Protein-Coupled Receptors.Journal of fluorescence · 2019Article
- FSHR Trans-Activation and Oligomerization.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018Review
- Targeting Somatostatin Receptors By Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles - Are We Striking Home?Nanotheranostics · 2018Article
- Interrogating cyclic AMP signaling using optical approaches.Cell calcium · 2017Review
- Optogenetic approaches for dissecting neuromodulation and GPCR signaling in neural circuits.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2017Review
- Exploring cells with targeted biosensors.The Journal of general physiology · 2017Review
- Following Optogenetic Dimerizers and Quantitative Prospects.Biophysical journal · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracellular 3'-5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is one of the principal second messengers downstream of a manifold of signal transduction pathways, including the ones triggered by G protein-coupled receptors. Not surprisingly, biochemical assays for cAMP have been instrumental for basic research and drug discovery for decades, providing insights into cellular physiology and guiding pharmaceutical industry. However, despite impressive track record, the majority of conventional biochemical tools for cAMP probing share the same fundamental shortcoming-all the measurements require sample disruption for cAMP liberation. This common bottleneck, together with inherently low spatial resolution of measurements (as cAMP is typically analyzed in lysates of thousands of cells), underpin the ensuing limitations of the conventional cAMP assays: (1) genuine kinetic measurements of cAMP levels over time in a single given sample are unfeasible; (2) inability to obtain precise information on cAMP spatial distribution and transfer at subcellular levels, let alone the attempts to pinpoint dynamic interactions of cAMP and its effectors. At the same time, tremendous progress in synthetic biology over the recent years culminated in drastic refinement of our toolbox, allowing us not only to bypass the limitations of conventional assays, but to put intracellular cAMP life-span under tight control-something, that seemed scarcely attainable before. In this review article we discuss the main classes of modern genetically-encoded tools tailored for cAMP probing and modulation in living systems. We examine the capabilities and weaknesses of these different tools in the context of their operational characteristics and applicability to various experimental set-ups involving living cells, providing the guidance for rational selection of the best tools for particular needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.