Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26441628›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2015

A unified framework for spiking and gap-junction interactions in distributed neuronal network simulations.

Jan Hahne, Moritz Helias, Susanne Kunkel, Jun Igarashi, Matthias Bolten, Andreas Frommer, Markus Diesmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan HahneDepartment of Mathematics and Science, Bergische Universität Wuppertal Wuppertal, Germany.
Moritz HeliasInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre Jülich, Germany ; Programming Environment Research Team, RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science Kobe, Japan.
Susanne KunkelProgramming Environment Research Team, RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science Kobe, Japan ; Simulation Laboratory Neuroscience, Bernstein Facility for Simulation and Database Technology, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich Research Centre Jülich, Germany.
Jun IgarashiNeural Computation Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Okinawa, Japan ; Laboratory for Neural Circuit Theory, RIKEN Brain Science Institute Wako, Japan.
Matthias BoltenDepartment of Mathematics and Science, Bergische Universität Wuppertal Wuppertal, Germany.
Andreas FrommerDepartment of Mathematics and Science, Bergische Universität Wuppertal Wuppertal, Germany.
Markus DiesmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre Jülich, Germany ; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University Aachen, Germany ; Department of Physics, Faculty 1, RWTH Aachen University Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary simulators for networks of point and few-compartment model neurons come with a plethora of ready-to-use neuron and synapse models and support complex network topologies. Recent technological advancements have broadened the spectrum of application further to the efficient simulation of brain-scale networks on supercomputers. In distributed network simulations the amount of spike data that accrues per millisecond and process is typically low, such that a common optimization strategy is to communicate spikes at relatively long intervals, where the upper limit is given by the shortest synaptic transmission delay in the network. This approach is well-suited for simulations that employ only chemical synapses but it has so far impeded the incorporation of gap-junction models, which require instantaneous neuronal interactions. Here, we present a numerical algorithm based on a waveform-relaxation technique which allows for network simulations with gap junctions in a way that is compatible with the delayed communication strategy. Using a reference implementation in the NEST simulator, we demonstrate that the algorithm and the required data structures can be smoothly integrated with existing code such that they complement the infrastructure for spiking connections. To show that the unified framework for gap-junction and spiking interactions achieves high performance and delivers high accuracy in the presence of gap junctions, we present benchmarks for workstations, clusters, and supercomputers. Finally, we discuss limitations of the novel technology.

Indexed as

gap junctionslarge-scale simulationparallel computingspiking neuronal networksupercomputerwaveform relaxation

Identifiers

PMID26441628
PMCPMC4563270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.