Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26441584›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2015

Resting state functional connectivity differences between behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Anne Hafkemeijer, Christiane Möller, Elise G P Dopper, Lize C Jiskoot, Tijn M Schouten, John C van Swieten, Wiesje M van der Flier, Hugo Vrenken, Yolande A L Pijnenburg, Frederik Barkhof and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Facial Emotion Recognition Ability May Improve in Alzheimer Disease: A Pilot Study.Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contrastive Brain Network Learning via Hierarchical Signed Graph Pooling Model.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 𝓗Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anne HafkemeijerDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Netherlands ; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Christiane MöllerAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Elise G P DopperDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Netherlands ; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lize C JiskootDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Netherlands ; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Neuropsychology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Tijn M SchoutenDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Netherlands ; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
John C van SwietenAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hugo VrenkenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Yolande A L PijnenburgAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Frederik BarkhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jeroen van der GrondDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Netherlands.
Serge A R B RomboutsDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Netherlands ; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are the most common types of early-onset dementia. Early differentiation between both types of dementia may be challenging due to heterogeneity and overlap of symptoms. Here, we apply resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study functional brain connectivity differences between AD and bvFTD.

methodsWe used resting state fMRI data of 31 AD patients, 25 bvFTD patients, and 29 controls from two centers specialized in dementia. We studied functional connectivity throughout the entire brain, applying two different analysis techniques, studying network-to-region and region-to-region connectivity. A general linear model approach was used to study group differences, while controlling for physiological noise, age, gender, study center, and regional gray matter volume.

resultsGiven gray matter differences, we observed decreased network-to-region connectivity in bvFTD between (a) lateral visual cortical network and lateral occipital and cuneal cortex, and (b) auditory system network and angular gyrus. In AD, we found decreased network-to-region connectivity between the dorsal visual stream network and lateral occipital and parietal opercular cortex. Region-to-region connectivity was decreased in bvFTD between superior temporal gyrus and cuneal, supracalcarine, intracalcarine cortex, and lingual gyrus.

conclusionWe showed that the pathophysiology of functional brain connectivity is different between AD and bvFTD. Our findings support the hypothesis that resting state fMRI shows disease-specific functional connectivity differences and is useful to elucidate the pathophysiology of AD and bvFTD. However, the group differences in functional connectivity are less abundant than has been shown in previous studies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasefrontotemporal dementiafunctional connectivityfunctional magnetic resonance imagingneurodegenerative disordersresting state fMRIresting state networks

Identifiers

PMID26441584
PMCPMC4561903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.