Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26441575›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

Neurochemical measurements in the zebrafish brain.

Lauren J Jones, James E McCutcheon, Andrew M J Young, William H J Norton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Towards Modeling Anhedonia and Its Treatment in Zebrafish.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electrochemical Measurement of Dopamine Release and Uptake in Zebrafish Following Treatment with Carboplatin.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren J JonesDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.
James E McCutcheonDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.
Andrew M J YoungDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.
William H J NortonDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish is an ideal model organism for behavioral genetics and neuroscience. The high conservation of genes and neurotransmitter pathways between zebrafish and other vertebrates permits the translation of research between species. Zebrafish behavior can be studied at both larval and adult stages and recent research has begun to establish zebrafish models for human disease. Fast scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) is an electrochemical technique that permits the detection of neurotransmitter release and reuptake. In this study we have used in vitro FSCV to measure the release of analytes in the adult zebrafish telencephalon. We compare different stimulation methods and present a characterization of neurochemical changes in the wild-type zebrafish brain. This study represents the first FSCV recordings in zebrafish, thus paving the way for neurochemical analysis of the fish brain.

Indexed as

5-HTadult braindopaminefast scan cyclic voltammetryhistamineneurochemistrypHzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID26441575
PMCPMC4561813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.